From: Reza Roboubi <reza@linisoft.com>
To: Peter Bornemann <eduard.epi@t-online.de>
Cc: Ronald Bultje <rbultje@ronald.bitfreak.net>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: >128 MB RAM stability problems (again)
Date: Wed, 04 Jul 2001 18:22:05 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3B43C13C.16BA4709@linisoft.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.33.0107050137500.4183-100000@eduard.t-online.de>
Nobody has answered a basic concern:
Why does Win2k work while Linux does not?
We already know that MiciSoft sometimes helps make stupid standards like P&P
ISA cards and then writes drivers for them. Something that is hard to do for
any _sane_ developers who did not help make the stupid "standard".
Having said that, if anybody has a technical answer for Ronald please give it
to him. He says:
My systems ARE FINE BECAUSE Win2k runs on them. This deserves a direct
technical answer if anybody has one.
--------------------
I'm a Linux user and proud of it.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2001-07-05 1:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2001-07-04 20:45 >128 MB RAM stability problems (again) Ronald Bultje
2001-07-04 19:11 ` J Sloan
2001-07-04 19:20 ` Charles Cazabon
2001-07-04 19:29 ` Alan Cox
2001-07-04 19:47 ` William Scott Lockwood III
2001-07-05 3:16 ` Bill Pringlemeir
2001-07-05 6:37 ` Ragnar Hojland Espinosa
2001-07-05 15:38 ` Bill Pringlemeir
2001-07-04 19:44 ` mark
2001-07-04 20:01 ` Jeffrey W. Baker
2001-07-04 20:05 ` George Bonser
2001-07-04 22:11 ` D. Stimits
2001-07-04 23:47 ` Peter Bornemann
2001-07-05 1:22 ` Reza Roboubi [this message]
2001-07-05 1:43 ` Charles Cazabon
2001-07-05 1:58 ` George Bonser
2001-07-05 15:51 ` Don Krause
2001-07-05 17:22 ` Gary White (Network Administrator)
2001-07-05 20:45 ` Peter A. Castro
2001-07-06 17:55 ` Ronald Bultje
2001-07-09 14:24 ` Andreas Bombe
[not found] <01Jul4.172916edt.62972@gpu.utcc.utoronto.ca>
2001-07-05 8:44 ` Ronald Bultje
2001-07-04 20:57 ` Chris Bacott
2001-07-05 7:22 ` StarTux
2001-07-05 8:40 ` Reza Roboubi
2001-07-05 10:50 ` Ronald Bultje
2001-07-05 15:41 ` Reza Roboubi
2001-07-05 9:15 ` D. Stimits
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2001-07-04 20:06 Alessandro Motter Ren
2001-07-04 20:16 ` George Bonser
2001-07-04 20:52 ` Ronald Bultje
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3B43C13C.16BA4709@linisoft.com \
--to=reza@linisoft.com \
--cc=eduard.epi@t-online.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rbultje@ronald.bitfreak.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox