public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@mandrakesoft.com>
To: Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>
Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@redhat.com>,
	Ben LaHaise <bcrl@redhat.com>, Jes Sorensen <jes@sunsite.dk>,
	"MEHTA,HIREN (A-SanJose,ex1)" <hiren_mehta@agilent.com>,
	"'linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org'" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: (reposting) how to get DMA'able memory within 4GB on 64-bit m
Date: Sat, 07 Jul 2001 08:17:53 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <3B46FDF1.A38E5BB6@mandrakesoft.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <E15Iqqm-0005jr-00@the-village.bc.nu>

Alan Cox wrote:
> 
> >  > that the expected lifespan for 32 bit systems is now less than 3 years, so
> >  > elaborate planning that delays implementation buys us nothing more than a
> >  > smaller window of usefulness.
> > Maybe by then only 64-bit cpus will matter.  Who knows.
> 
> Reality check.
> 
> Embedded PCI 32bit processors are going to be very common
> People are only now retiring 486's
> 
> So add another seven or eight years to your estimate

Given a little more context, I thought we were talking specifically
about 64bit-PCI-on-32bit-machines?

Assuming that, AFAICS Ben's statement seems more correct.

And IMHO we definitely should not optimize for 64-bit-on-32-bit case. 
Let CONFIG_HIGHMEM grow dma_addr_t to 64-bits, for that case only...

-- 
Jeff Garzik      | A recent study has shown that too much soup
Building 1024    | can cause malaise in laboratory mice.
MandrakeSoft     |

  reply	other threads:[~2001-07-07 12:18 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 36+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2001-06-28 16:20 (reposting) how to get DMA'able memory within 4GB on 64-bit m achi ne MEHTA,HIREN (A-SanJose,ex1)
2001-06-28 19:41 ` Jes Sorensen
2001-06-28 22:01   ` David S. Miller
2001-06-28 22:20     ` Jes Sorensen
2001-06-28 22:27       ` David S. Miller
2001-06-28 22:28       ` Alan Cox
2001-07-02  8:09         ` Jens Axboe
2001-06-28 22:24     ` Ben LaHaise
2001-06-28 22:29       ` David S. Miller
2001-06-28 22:31         ` Ben LaHaise
2001-06-28 22:38           ` David S. Miller
2001-06-28 22:45             ` Ben LaHaise
2001-06-28 22:48               ` David S. Miller
2001-06-28 22:48             ` (reposting) how to get DMA'able memory within 4GB on 64-bit m Alan Cox
2001-06-28 22:55             ` (reposting) how to get DMA'able memory within 4GB on 64-bit m achi ne Jes Sorensen
2001-06-29  9:16               ` David S. Miller
2001-06-29  9:56                 ` Alan Cox
2001-06-29 20:37                   ` David S. Miller
2001-07-05 21:06                     ` Jes Sorensen
2001-07-05 23:47                       ` David S. Miller
2001-07-05 23:50                         ` Ben LaHaise
2001-07-06 13:31                         ` Jes Sorensen
2001-07-06 23:46                           ` David S. Miller
2001-07-07  3:58                             ` Ben LaHaise
2001-07-07  5:35                               ` David S. Miller
2001-07-07 12:06                                 ` (reposting) how to get DMA'able memory within 4GB on 64-bit m Alan Cox
2001-07-07 12:17                                   ` Jeff Garzik [this message]
2001-07-07 12:21                                     ` Alan Cox
2001-07-07 13:00                                       ` David S. Miller
2001-07-11 19:16                                         ` Jes Sorensen
2001-07-11 21:54                                           ` Chris Wedgwood
2001-07-11 23:17                                             ` David S. Miller
2001-07-11 23:07                                           ` David S. Miller
2001-06-28 22:40           ` Alan Cox
2001-07-02  8:09       ` (reposting) how to get DMA'able memory within 4GB on 64-bit m achi ne Jens Axboe
2001-06-28 21:45 ` David S. Miller

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=3B46FDF1.A38E5BB6@mandrakesoft.com \
    --to=jgarzik@mandrakesoft.com \
    --cc=alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk \
    --cc=bcrl@redhat.com \
    --cc=davem@redhat.com \
    --cc=hiren_mehta@agilent.com \
    --cc=jes@sunsite.dk \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox