public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Thomas Davis <tadavis@lbl.gov>
To: Jeff Golds <jgolds@resilience.com>
Cc: Laurent Itti <itti@java.usc.edu>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: receive stats null for bond0 in 2.4.6
Date: Thu, 12 Jul 2001 13:21:57 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <3B4E06E5.899CAD8E@lbl.gov> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.SV4.3.96.1010711163709.5481B-100000@java.usc.edu> <3B4CF00C.5B62DDBA@resilience.com> <3B4DF1A8.BDE85995@lbl.gov> <3B4E02BD.7A9087E2@resilience.com>

Jeff Golds wrote:
> 
> So what's wrong with collecting the slaves' receive stats and reporting
> them as stats for the bonding driver?  At least then you can quickly see
> the total for all devices currently owned by the bonding device.
> 
> Stats are just a tool so that you can see if things are behaving
> properly, you can report back whatever you like.  I prefer to have the
> bonding driver collect the slaves' stats so you can easily see if
> enslaved devices are receiving packets.  If you want to see which device
> is getting more traffic, that's easy to see by looking at the individual
> slave.
> 

the person who ported the driver over to 2.4 from 2.2 made that choice.

It wasn't me.  It was one of the network guys (Dave/Alexy/??).

One problem with collecting all the stats into the bonding driver -
which I have seen, is you can quickly start to overflow counters.  And
they don't roll over.

-- 
------------------------+--------------------------------------------------
Thomas Davis		| ASG Cluster guy
tadavis@lbl.gov		| 
(510) 486-4524		| "80 nodes and chugging Captain!"

      reply	other threads:[~2001-07-12 20:24 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2001-07-11 23:47 receive stats null for bond0 in 2.4.6 Laurent Itti
2001-07-12  0:32 ` Jeff Golds
2001-07-12  0:32   ` Laurent Itti
2001-07-12 18:51   ` Thomas Davis
2001-07-12 20:04     ` Jeff Golds
2001-07-12 20:21       ` Thomas Davis [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=3B4E06E5.899CAD8E@lbl.gov \
    --to=tadavis@lbl.gov \
    --cc=itti@java.usc.edu \
    --cc=jgolds@resilience.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox