From: Martin Knoblauch <Martin.Knoblauch@TeraPort.de>
To: reiser@namesys.com
Cc: "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Experimental status of ReiserFS [was: Re: OT: Journaling FS Comparison]
Date: Mon, 23 Jul 2001 12:53:49 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3B5C023D.2E0D3B04@TeraPort.de> (raw)
Hi,
setting aside my personal preferences (used to work for SGI :-),
ReiserFS seems "to have won" the race for being first journaling FS in
the kernel. To me it seems pretty stable and well performing. My
question is: what keeps it in the "experimental" state?
Thanks
Martin
--
------------------------------------------------------------------
Martin Knoblauch | email: Martin.Knoblauch@TeraPort.de
TeraPort GmbH | Phone: +49-89-510857-309
C+ITS | Fax: +49-89-510857-111
http://www.teraport.de | Mobile: +49-170-4904759
reply other threads:[~2001-07-23 10:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3B5C023D.2E0D3B04@TeraPort.de \
--to=martin.knoblauch@teraport.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=reiser@namesys.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox