From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Fri, 3 Aug 2001 19:37:54 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Fri, 3 Aug 2001 19:37:44 -0400 Received: from itvu-63-210-168-13.intervu.net ([63.210.168.13]:40840 "EHLO pga.intervu.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Fri, 3 Aug 2001 19:37:26 -0400 Message-ID: <3B6B378D.7F72DC8@randomlogic.com> Date: Fri, 03 Aug 2001 16:45:17 -0700 From: "Paul G. Allen" X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.76 [en] (X11; U; Linux 2.4.2-2 i686) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 CC: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [OT] DMCA loop hole In-Reply-To: <87zo9glq2j.fsf@wesley.springies.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: unlisted-recipients:; (no To-header on input)@localhost.localdomain Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Alan Shutko wrote: > > writes: > > > Yeah it is. EULA has become totally valid and should be upheld by any > > courts who come across one. (In the US at least. I don't know the > > situation outside the US). One of the recent bills/acts/whatever made > > this change. > > You're thinking of UCITA, which is adopted on a state-by-state basis, > and has not been adopted by all states. AIUI, at least. > Some states have even enacted laws AGAINST UCITA. Good for them. PGA -- Paul G. Allen UNIX Admin II/Programmer Akamai Technologies, Inc. www.akamai.com Work: (858)909-3630 Cell: (858)395-5043