From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Sat, 4 Aug 2001 22:25:38 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Sat, 4 Aug 2001 22:25:17 -0400 Received: from pD9504018.dip.t-dialin.net ([217.80.64.24]:41454 "HELO ozean.schottelius.org") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id ; Sat, 4 Aug 2001 22:25:06 -0400 Message-ID: <3B6CAE4E.17850717@pcsystems.de> Date: Sun, 05 Aug 2001 04:24:14 +0200 From: Nico Schottelius X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.76 [en] (X11; U; Linux 2.4.7 i686) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Linux Kernel Mailing List Subject: ext3/reiserfs: ext3fine, reiser got OOPS! Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hello guys! I 've been using ext3 and reiserfs for somedays with 2.4.7. Using mkreiserfs I recieved some null pointer problems and recieved a kernel oops. While ext3 is mounted as fast as ext2, reiserfs seems is slower. ext3, 10 GB: ~ 0.5 seconds reisferfs 10 GB: ~ 3-5 seconds Generating the journal with tune2fs was again much faster than mkreiserfs. But I think this is because reiser creates a new fs, wherefore mkfs.ext2 did that before. While running there occured some problems with reiserfs. I am wondering that reiserfs first got into the kernel before ext3! Nico