public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: David Ford <david@blue-labs.org>
To: landley@webofficenow.com
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: RP_FILTER runs too late
Date: Tue, 07 Aug 2001 14:06:01 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <3B702E09.8030207@blue-labs.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3B6F8E17.9090100@blue-labs.org> <01080620523409.04153@localhost.localdomain>

Oh I have it working, there is just one workaround requirement and one 
nit with rp_filter.  rp_filter has to be disabled and that is an SNAT 
item.  The workaround for a "pre-routing" snat is to setup ip route 
rules, tag the packets, and finally nat them.  It accomplishes the task 
I need but is in my opinion a hack.

I'd rather see SNAT available in pre-routing and have rp_filter run 
against the packet before it hits the netfilter code.

-d

Rob Landley wrote:

>On Tuesday 07 August 2001 02:43, David Ford wrote:
>
>>I finally figured out why my SNAT setup wasn't working.  I had 1 in
>>eth0/rp_filter and that was silently breaking it.
>>
>>This discussion follows the scripts located at website
>>http://blue-labs.org/ , rc.networking and rc.firewalling.  Both are live
>>meaning you'll see any changes I make.
>>
>>Here's the scoop.  I run a VPN from here to my colo server...but I don't
>>want all my traffic going through the VPN.  So I need to finagle a
>>method of NAT.  Now because the NAT code runs behind the routing code,
>>packets are already heading the wrong direction when they get their
>>headers changed.  Because of that you need to tag them with a mark and
>>implement routing rules based on that mark.  As an aside note, all that
>>could be avoided if SNAT would just be available in PREROUTING.
>>
>>Ok. Now that packets are flowing through the right interfaces, things
>>look good but wait...the reply packets are vanishing without a trace.
>>
>>The culprit is the rp_filter on eth0.  The packet comes in, gets the
>>header rewritten then gets chomped by rp_filter.  I'm not quite sure why
>>because the src is still an external IP and the destination before and
>>after is still an internal IP.
>>
>>Wouldn't the rp_filter be more effective if it came ahead of the nat
>>code?  As it is now, it's useless on that interface.
>>
>>David
>>
>
>I just put up some firewall rules as part of the Dynamic Virtual Private 
>Networking project on sourceforge at http://dvpn.sourceforge.net.  It shows 
>both source and destination nat, port forwarding outside of a box, and a 
>couple other fun goodies.  Not necessarily your kind of VPN, but maybe it'll 
>help...
>
>I'm not sure what you're trying to do, but I got everything I tried to work...
>
>Rob
>




  reply	other threads:[~2001-08-07 18:06 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2001-08-07  6:43 RP_FILTER runs too late David Ford
2001-08-07  0:52 ` Rob Landley
2001-08-07 18:06   ` David Ford [this message]
2001-08-07 19:07     ` Dan Hollis
2001-08-09  8:05       ` Rob Landley

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=3B702E09.8030207@blue-labs.org \
    --to=david@blue-labs.org \
    --cc=landley@webofficenow.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox