From: george anzinger <george@mvista.com>
To: Russell King <rmk@arm.linux.org.uk>
Cc: "christophe barbé" <christophe.barbe@lineo.fr>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: How should nano_sleep be fixed (was: ptrace(), fork(), sleep(), exit(), SIGCHLD)
Date: Thu, 16 Aug 2001 07:16:27 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3B7BD5BB.F5FCE1DD@mvista.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20010813093116Z270036-761+611@vger.kernel.org> <20010814092849.E13892@pc8.lineo.fr> <20010814201825Z270798-760+1687@vger.kernel.org> <3B7A9953.744977A5@mvista.com> <3B7AB93D.F8B5B455@mvista.com> <3B7B1B07.A9FB293B@mvista.com> <20010816121746.A5861@pc8.lineo.fr> <20010816112905.A30202@flint.arm.linux.org.uk>
Russell King wrote:
>
> On Thu, Aug 16, 2001 at 12:17:46PM +0200, christophe barbé wrote:
> > > asmlinkage long sys_nanosleep(struct timespec *rqtp, struct timespec
> > > *rmtp)
> > > {
> > > struct timespec t;
> > > unsigned long expire;
> > > + struct pt_regs * regs = (struct pt_regs *) &rqtp;
>
> Note also that this is bogus as an architecture invariant.
>
> On ARM, we have to pass a pt_regs pointer into any function that requires
> it.
>
Does that mean that any function that requires pt_regs _must_ not be in
common code? Isn't there a better solution than implementing these
functions over and over for each platform?
George
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2001-08-16 14:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2001-08-13 8:29 ptrace(), fork(), sleep(), exit(), SIGCHLD Bruce Janson
2001-08-14 7:28 ` christophe barbé
2001-08-14 15:06 ` Bruce Janson
2001-08-15 15:46 ` george anzinger
2001-08-15 17:53 ` george anzinger
2001-08-15 18:02 ` george anzinger
2001-08-16 0:59 ` How should nano_sleep be fixed (was: ptrace(), fork(), sleep(), exit(), SIGCHLD) george anzinger
2001-08-16 10:17 ` christophe barbé
2001-08-16 10:29 ` Russell King
2001-08-16 14:16 ` george anzinger [this message]
2001-08-16 16:00 ` christophe barbé
2001-08-16 16:12 ` Russell King
2001-08-16 18:17 ` george anzinger
2001-08-17 18:25 ` george anzinger
2001-08-17 18:57 ` Victor Yodaiken
2001-08-17 19:56 ` george anzinger
2001-08-22 18:40 ` Russell King
2001-08-23 20:04 ` george anzinger
2001-08-23 20:11 ` Russell King
2001-08-23 21:13 ` george anzinger
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3B7BD5BB.F5FCE1DD@mvista.com \
--to=george@mvista.com \
--cc=christophe.barbe@lineo.fr \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rmk@arm.linux.org.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox