* K6 sig11 Bug detection.
@ 2001-08-17 10:13 James Nord
2001-08-17 10:22 ` Brian Gerst
2001-08-17 12:05 ` [New URL FOR K6 bug] " André Dahlqvist
0 siblings, 2 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: James Nord @ 2001-08-17 10:13 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-kernel
Hi,
I have a Debian based system with a custom 2.4.7 kernel compiled with
gcc version 2.95.4 20010703 (Debian prerelease)
(also saw the same with 2.2.10+ gcc 2.95)
The CPU in the machine is a AMD K6 200MHz, and has 64MB of SDRAM
I reomved the heatsink and the serial is Cxxxxxxxx, however in the
kernel boot messages I get the following,
Aug 17 09:06:49 phoenix kernel: CPU: Before vendor init, caps: 008001bf
008005bf 00000000, vendor = 2
Aug 17 09:06:49 phoenix kernel: AMD K6 stepping B detected - <6>K6 BUG
9016725 20000000 (Report these if test report is incorrect)
Aug 17 09:06:49 phoenix kernel: AMD K6 stepping B detected - probably OK
(after B9730xxxx).
Aug 17 09:06:49 phoenix kernel: Please see
http://www.mygale.com/~poulot/k6bug.html
Aug 17 09:06:49 phoenix kernel: CPU: L1 I Cache: 32K (32 bytes/line), D
cache 32K (32 bytes/line)
Aug 17 09:06:49 phoenix kernel: CPU: After vendor init, caps: 008001bf
008005bf 00000000 00000000
Aug 17 09:06:49 phoenix kernel: CPU: After generic, caps: 008001bf
008005bf 00000000 00000000
Aug 17 09:06:49 phoenix kernel: CPU: Common caps: 008001bf
008005bf 00000000 00000000
Aug 17 09:06:49 phoenix kernel: CPU: AMD-K6tm w/ multimedia extensions
stepping 01
Is the stepping not the first part of the serial? I have 64MB (the
amount that triggers the bug IIRC) in the system and the the kernel and
everything else compiles without generating a SIG11.
Is this a false detection or would it be possible that I have a wrongly
tagged CPU?
Also the link http://www.mygale.com/~poulot/k6bug.html does not exist.
Please CC replies to me as I am not on the list.
Regards,
/James
--
Technology is a word that describes something that doesn't work yet.
Douglas Adams
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread* Re: K6 sig11 Bug detection.
2001-08-17 10:13 K6 sig11 Bug detection James Nord
@ 2001-08-17 10:22 ` Brian Gerst
2001-08-17 12:05 ` [New URL FOR K6 bug] " André Dahlqvist
1 sibling, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Brian Gerst @ 2001-08-17 10:22 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: James Nord; +Cc: linux-kernel
James Nord wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I have a Debian based system with a custom 2.4.7 kernel compiled with
> gcc version 2.95.4 20010703 (Debian prerelease)
> (also saw the same with 2.2.10+ gcc 2.95)
>
> The CPU in the machine is a AMD K6 200MHz, and has 64MB of SDRAM
>
> I reomved the heatsink and the serial is Cxxxxxxxx, however in the
> kernel boot messages I get the following,
>
> Aug 17 09:06:49 phoenix kernel: CPU: Before vendor init, caps: 008001bf
> 008005bf 00000000, vendor = 2
> Aug 17 09:06:49 phoenix kernel: AMD K6 stepping B detected - <6>K6 BUG
> 9016725 20000000 (Report these if test report is incorrect)
> Aug 17 09:06:49 phoenix kernel: AMD K6 stepping B detected - probably OK
> (after B9730xxxx).
> Aug 17 09:06:49 phoenix kernel: Please see
> http://www.mygale.com/~poulot/k6bug.html
> Aug 17 09:06:49 phoenix kernel: CPU: L1 I Cache: 32K (32 bytes/line), D
> cache 32K (32 bytes/line)
> Aug 17 09:06:49 phoenix kernel: CPU: After vendor init, caps: 008001bf
> 008005bf 00000000 00000000
> Aug 17 09:06:49 phoenix kernel: CPU: After generic, caps: 008001bf
> 008005bf 00000000 00000000
> Aug 17 09:06:49 phoenix kernel: CPU: Common caps: 008001bf
> 008005bf 00000000 00000000
> Aug 17 09:06:49 phoenix kernel: CPU: AMD-K6tm w/ multimedia extensions
> stepping 01
>
> Is the stepping not the first part of the serial? I have 64MB (the
> amount that triggers the bug IIRC) in the system and the the kernel and
> everything else compiles without generating a SIG11.
>
> Is this a false detection or would it be possible that I have a wrongly
> tagged CPU?
>
> Also the link http://www.mygale.com/~poulot/k6bug.html does not exist.
>
> Please CC replies to me as I am not on the list.
You have a later B step CPU with that bug fixed. Otherwise you would
have seen "system stability may be impaired when more than 32 MB are
used." in the logs. For some reason, AMD didn't bump the stepping when
they fixed that bug.
--
Brian Gerst
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* [New URL FOR K6 bug] Re: K6 sig11 Bug detection.
2001-08-17 10:13 K6 sig11 Bug detection James Nord
2001-08-17 10:22 ` Brian Gerst
@ 2001-08-17 12:05 ` André Dahlqvist
1 sibling, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: André Dahlqvist @ 2001-08-17 12:05 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-kernel; +Cc: Alan Cox
> Also the link http://www.mygale.com/~poulot/k6bug.html does not exist.
New URL seams to be http://www.multimania.com/poulot/k6bug.html.
Alan, can you correct this in your next -ac?
--
André Dahlqvist <andre.dahlqvist@telia.com>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
[parent not found: <no.id>]
* Re: K6 sig11 Bug detection.
[not found] <no.id>
@ 2001-08-17 10:28 ` Alan Cox
0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Alan Cox @ 2001-08-17 10:28 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: James Nord; +Cc: linux-kernel
> Aug 17 09:06:49 phoenix kernel: CPU: Before vendor init, caps: 008001bf
> 008005bf 00000000, vendor = 2
> Aug 17 09:06:49 phoenix kernel: AMD K6 stepping B detected - <6>K6 BUG
> 9016725 20000000 (Report these if test report is incorrect)
> Aug 17 09:06:49 phoenix kernel: AMD K6 stepping B detected - probably OK
> (after B9730xxxx).
Looks ok to me.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2001-08-17 12:07 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2001-08-17 10:13 K6 sig11 Bug detection James Nord
2001-08-17 10:22 ` Brian Gerst
2001-08-17 12:05 ` [New URL FOR K6 bug] " André Dahlqvist
[not found] <no.id>
2001-08-17 10:28 ` Alan Cox
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox