From: Andrew Morton <akpm@zip.com.au>
To: Adrian Cox <adrian@humboldt.co.uk>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Filling holes in ext2
Date: Thu, 23 Aug 2001 10:46:46 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3B854186.F0C00E3C@zip.com.au> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3B83E9FD.6020801@humboldt.co.uk> <3B83FB3F.A0BDC056@zip.com.au> <3B853BE6.3010703@humboldt.co.uk>
Adrian Cox wrote:
>
> Andrew Morton wrote:
>
> > It matters. -ac kernels handle this by clearing out the blocks
> > on the error path in __block_prepare_write(). If you retest with
> > -ac kernels, you should just see zeroes.
>
> That doesn't help. The problem occurs just the same on -ac kernels.
OK, that code is for IO errors and disk-full.
> In this case __block_prepare_write() is successful. What happens is that
> if __copy_from_user() fails, the block remains mapped but not up to
> date. Thus the next read access to the file fetches the garbage data off
> disk, and presents it to the user.
generic_file_write() will mark the page not up-to-date in this case.
I wonder what's actually going on? Perhaps the fact that we've
instantiated a block in ext2 outside i_size?
If you change the error path in -ac's generic_file_write() thusly:
- goto fail_write;
+ status = -EFAULT;
+ goto sync_failure;
does it fix it?
Can you send the code you're using to demonstrate this?
-
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2001-08-23 17:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2001-08-22 17:21 Filling holes in ext2 Adrian Cox
2001-08-22 18:34 ` Andrew Morton
2001-08-22 18:59 ` Adrian Cox
2001-08-23 17:22 ` Adrian Cox
2001-08-23 17:46 ` Andrew Morton [this message]
2001-08-23 19:17 ` Adrian Cox
2001-08-23 19:23 ` Alan Cox
2001-08-23 19:41 ` Andrew Morton
2001-08-23 21:21 ` Adrian Cox
2001-08-23 17:47 ` Alan Cox
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3B854186.F0C00E3C@zip.com.au \
--to=akpm@zip.com.au \
--cc=adrian@humboldt.co.uk \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox