From: Ben Greear <greearb@candelatech.com>
To: Martin Josefsson <gandalf@wlug.westbo.se>
Cc: Bernhard Busch <bbusch@biochem.mpg.de>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Poor Performance for ethernet bonding
Date: Fri, 24 Aug 2001 08:16:46 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3B866FDE.4003F3DD@candelatech.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.21.0108241630060.17009-100000@tux.rsn.bth.se>
Martin Josefsson wrote:
>
> On Fri, 24 Aug 2001, Bernhard Busch wrote:
>
> > Hi
> >
> >
> > I have tried to use ethernet network interfaces bonding to increase
> > peformance.
> >
> > Bonding is working fine, but the performance is rather poor.
> > FTP between 2 machines ( kernel 2.4.4 and 4 port DLink 100Mbit ethernet
> > card)
> > results in a transfer rate of 3MB/s).
> >
> > Any Hints?
>
> I've seen this too, it doesn't have anything to do with bonding, it's the
> fact that you are sending packets out several interfaces at once that's
> the cause. Same thing happend to me when transmitting at high speeds on
> two interfaces at once without bonding. And you are using 4 interfaces so
> I can imagine that it will be even worse than I saw.
>
> And bonding on my two eepro100 in another machine works perfectly,
> no problem maxing out at aproximatly 200Mbit.
I've run a sustained 10Mbps tx & rx on 8 ports (2 of the Dlink 4-port NICs)
for over 24 hours on a 2.4.7 kernel. I was not using bonding though. I'm guessing you're
seeing lots of carrier errors, as the tulip driver used to be very bad
at...uh..working. Try a 2.4.6 kernel or better and I bet your problem
goes away...
Ben
--
Ben Greear <greearb@candelatech.com> <Ben_Greear@excite.com>
President of Candela Technologies Inc http://www.candelatech.com
ScryMUD: http://scry.wanfear.com http://scry.wanfear.com/~greear
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2001-08-24 15:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2001-08-24 13:37 Poor Performance for ethernet bonding Bernhard Busch
2001-08-24 14:12 ` Sergey Ostrovsky
2001-08-24 14:33 ` Martin Josefsson
2001-08-24 15:16 ` Ben Greear [this message]
[not found] <3B865882.24D57941@biochem.mpg.de.suse.lists.linux.kernel>
2001-08-24 13:44 ` Andi Kleen
2001-08-24 15:19 ` Ben Greear
2001-08-24 15:22 ` Andi Kleen
2001-08-24 15:45 ` Ben Greear
2001-08-24 16:04 ` Andi Kleen
2001-08-27 7:40 ` Henning P. Schmiedehausen
2001-08-24 18:17 ` Thomas Davis
2001-08-24 20:59 ` Ben Greear
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2001-08-25 7:04 Willy Tarreau
2001-08-25 18:23 ` Ben Greear
2001-08-26 7:59 ` willy tarreau
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3B866FDE.4003F3DD@candelatech.com \
--to=greearb@candelatech.com \
--cc=bbusch@biochem.mpg.de \
--cc=gandalf@wlug.westbo.se \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox