public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: David Ford <david@blue-labs.org>
To: Brian Strand <bstrand@switchmanagement.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: 3ware: no cards found in 2.2.19, cards found in 2.4.x
Date: Fri, 24 Aug 2001 12:34:03 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <3B8681FB.40403@blue-labs.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3B85E7E2.7000602@switchmanagement.com> <3B85FBC6.3080305@blue-labs.org> <3B867C6A.4000700@switchmanagement.com>

Both of these address the VM issues.  I won't say VM is perfect, but you 
can't know if it works better for you like it does for me until you try 
it.  Upgrading a kernel is a pretty quick and painless job.  As to the 
corruption, I don't see enough below to make a start as to the cause.

David

Brian Strand wrote:

> Do either of these kernels fix the "2.4.x VM suckage" problems?  I 
> don't want to use a 2.4.x kernel because Oracle runs almost 2x slower 
> (with identical hardware config) on 2.4.4 and 2.4.6 versus 2.2.16 (and 
> I have 4G of swap for 2G of physical mem, so that is not the problem), 
> not to mention that one of these 2.4.x kernels caused Oracle 
> corruption.  I don't feel so comfortable testing new kernels with 
> several hundred GBs of customer data anymore :) .
>
> David Ford wrote:
>
>> I first suggest that you try kernel 2.4.9 or the latest of 2.4.8-acN.
>>
>> David
>>
>> Brian Strand wrote:
>>
>>> I have a quad xeon 2GB system running Oracle which I am reverting to 
>>> 2.2.x because of 2.4.x's less than desirable VM performance (causing 
>>> a 2x Oracle slowdown, reported about a month ago on linux-kernel).  
>>> I foolishly put a 3ware card in at the same time as I "upgraded" the 
>>> box to 2.4.4, so now I am in the undesirable position of needing to 
>>> go back to 2.2.19, but that kernel cannot find the card.  I get the 
>>> following message during boot:
>>>
>>> 3w-xxxx: tw_find_cards(): No cards found
>>> /lib/moduless/2.2.19-2GB-SMP/scsi/3w-xxxx.o: init_module: Device or 
>>> resource busy
>>>
>>> I have tried compiling the 3ware driver version 
>>> 1.02.00.{004,006,007} all with the same result.  Has anyone managed 
>>> to use a Suse 2.2.19 kernel with 3ware cards with any success?  The 
>>> 1.02.00.004 driver is from the stock 2.2.19 kernel, the .006 driver 
>>> is from 3ware's website, and the .007 driver is from 2.2.20pre9.
>>
>>




  reply	other threads:[~2001-08-24 16:34 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2001-08-24  5:36 3ware: no cards found in 2.2.19, cards found in 2.4.x Brian Strand
2001-08-24  7:01 ` David Ford
2001-08-24 16:10   ` Brian Strand
2001-08-24 16:34     ` David Ford [this message]
     [not found] <E15aKzT-0006BX-00@the-village.bc.nu>
2001-08-25 11:56 ` Brian Strand

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=3B8681FB.40403@blue-labs.org \
    --to=david@blue-labs.org \
    --cc=bstrand@switchmanagement.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox