Re: 2.4 broken on 486SX

Brian Gerst
2001-08-24T20:37:43Z

Ross Vandegrift wrote:
>
> Ack, that was a horrific problem report. Here are a few relevant data points I left out:
>
> Kernels have always been compiled only with 386 optimizations.
> (tried 486 a few times, no difference)
> Always built including soft float support (not that it matters so early)
> Always built with gcc 2.95.2
> Same kernel binaries work perfectly on a number of other boxen:
> A 386DX, a number of Pentium 100's, another 486SX, and a K6-2

What was the last known working kernel for this machine? Have you tried
any -ac kernels?

--

Brian Gerst