From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Sat, 25 Aug 2001 00:14:16 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Sat, 25 Aug 2001 00:14:06 -0400 Received: from james.kalifornia.com ([208.179.59.2]:14448 "EHLO james.kalifornia.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Sat, 25 Aug 2001 00:14:00 -0400 Message-ID: <3B87256C.4050503@kalifornia.com> Date: Fri, 24 Aug 2001 21:11:24 -0700 From: Ben Ford User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:0.9.3+) Gecko/20010821 X-Accept-Language: en-us MIME-Version: 1.0 To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Will 2.6 require Python for any configuration ? (CML2) In-Reply-To: <20010823135318.Z14302@cpe-24-221-152-185.az.sprintbbd.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Tom Rini wrote: >On Fri, Aug 24, 2001 at 12:41:39AM +0400, Samium Gromoff wrote: > >> 1. I heard a lot of arguments why _not_ to include >> python. Also alot of arguments why _ignore_ the arguments >> to _not_ include python. >> BUT! No arguments why to _include_ it... >> kinda disbalance as i see. >> > >The main reason to include it, is that that's what it was done in. > That is never an excuse.