From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Mon, 27 Aug 2001 15:42:37 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Mon, 27 Aug 2001 15:42:27 -0400 Received: from archive.osdlab.org ([65.201.151.11]:1249 "EHLO fire.osdlab.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Mon, 27 Aug 2001 15:42:19 -0400 Message-ID: <3B8AA136.F1D0B4BE@osdlab.org> Date: Mon, 27 Aug 2001 12:36:22 -0700 From: "Randy.Dunlap" Organization: OSDL X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.77 [en] (X11; U; Linux 2.4.3-20mdk i686) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "Paul G. Allen" CC: kplug-list@kernel-panic.org, "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCE] Linux Kernel 2.4.9 Docs. and Metrics In-Reply-To: <3.0.6.32.20010821162635.00a936c0@pop-server.san.rr.com> <3.0.6.32.20010821173148.00a7fac0@pop-server.san.rr.com> <3B832AB6.2DC46BE8@randomlogic.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org "Paul G. Allen" wrote: > > BTW, I too think the interface could be better, but the HTML is nothing compared to the graphical layout that is used in the program itself. I've been thinking > of posting a call tree that shows all (or at least some) of the functions from kernel boot through something like, say, complete hardware initialization. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Yes, you could improve greatly on this one: http://home.att.net/~rddunlap/linit/lin240_init_x86-2.html ~Randy