From: "Bobby D. Bryant" <bdbryant@mail.utexas.edu>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Athlon doesn't like Athlon optimisation?
Date: Fri, 31 Aug 2001 13:17:37 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3B8FE2D1.A0AD0B04@mail.utexas.edu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20010831044247.B811@gondor.com> <3B8EFF67.9010409@digitalaudioresources.org> <3B8FD501.CE027082@bigfoot.com>
Tim Moore wrote:
> > It seems to work somewhat better for some if you set your BIOS to the
> > conservative settings, but that didn't help me. I have an Epox 8KTA3+ (Via
> > KT133A) w/ a 1.4GHz Athlon and 512MB memory. If you can't get it to work that
> > way, just stick with the K6 setting. The point is, your hardware is likely fine
> > (fine being relative, I suppose)
> > If there are other tricks, I'm all ears.
>
> The i686 setting works perfectly.
For some people. I have an 8KTA3+ that will boot as an i686, but starts oopsing its
shorts off after it has been up a while.
I posted some of the oopsen a few months ago, and to my feeble mind they all looked
memory related. (Several were "bug in slab.c" kind of thing, IIRC.)
Bobby Bryant
Austin, Texas
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2001-08-31 19:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 46+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2001-08-31 2:42 Athlon doesn't like Athlon optimisation? Jan Niehusmann
2001-08-31 3:07 ` David Hollister
2001-08-31 3:34 ` Albert D. Cahalan
2001-08-31 3:50 ` Richard Gooch
2001-08-31 4:20 ` Dan Hollis
2001-08-31 5:05 ` Chris Abbey
2001-08-31 8:27 ` Arjan van de Ven
2001-08-31 9:36 ` Nicholas Knight
2001-08-31 14:17 ` David Hollister
2001-08-31 6:02 ` Paul G. Allen
2001-08-31 6:15 ` Steven Spence
2001-08-31 14:06 ` Alan Cox
2001-08-31 9:21 ` Phillip Susi
[not found] ` <l4nnm9.rqp.ln@schlich.user.dfncis.de>
2001-08-31 13:58 ` Athlon doesn't like Athlon optimisation? [PATCH] Radu-Adrian Feurdean
2001-08-31 14:00 ` Athlon doesn't like Athlon optimisation? Alan Cox
2001-08-31 20:37 ` Dan Hollis
2001-08-31 20:53 ` Alan Cox
2001-09-08 18:01 ` Eric W. Biederman
2001-08-31 20:53 ` Mike Fedyk
2001-08-31 8:08 ` Joerg Plate
2001-08-31 18:18 ` Tim Moore
2001-08-31 19:17 ` Bobby D. Bryant [this message]
2001-08-31 19:43 ` Tim Moore
2001-09-01 10:06 ` Jim Roland
2001-09-01 12:04 ` Joerg Plate
2001-09-01 14:39 ` David Hollister
2001-09-01 15:50 ` Alan Cox
2001-09-01 16:27 ` David Hollister
2001-09-03 8:03 ` Jim Roland
[not found] <fa.kt7mv6v.qiq718@ifi.uio.no>
[not found] ` <fa.j3okgqv.lmova7@ifi.uio.no>
2001-08-31 12:11 ` Dan Maas
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2001-09-03 8:13 Eric Olson
2001-09-03 15:55 ` Ghozlane Toumi
2001-09-04 10:19 ` Dan Hollis
2001-09-04 9:35 ` Matthew S . Hallacy
2001-09-05 5:21 Eric Olson
2001-09-05 9:59 ` Matthew S . Hallacy
2001-09-05 15:56 ` David Hollister
2001-09-05 14:22 noneuclidean
2001-09-05 17:37 ` Simen Thoresen
2001-09-05 18:07 ` Dan Hollis
2001-09-05 18:37 Eric Olson
2001-09-07 7:33 Jim Blomo
2001-09-07 8:00 ` Dan Hollis
2001-09-07 8:39 ` Andrzej Krzysztofowicz
2001-09-07 17:25 ` Mike Fedyk
2001-09-23 10:04 Jim Blomo
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3B8FE2D1.A0AD0B04@mail.utexas.edu \
--to=bdbryant@mail.utexas.edu \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox