From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Mon, 3 Sep 2001 18:03:56 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Mon, 3 Sep 2001 18:03:46 -0400 Received: from Hell.WH8.TU-Dresden.De ([141.30.225.3]:2827 "EHLO Hell.WH8.TU-Dresden.De") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Mon, 3 Sep 2001 18:03:36 -0400 Message-ID: <3B93FE48.B53B5DF4@delusion.de> Date: Tue, 04 Sep 2001 00:03:52 +0200 From: "Udo A. Steinberg" Organization: Disorganized X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.78 [en] (X11; U; Linux 2.4.9-ac7 i686) X-Accept-Language: en, de MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Tim Waugh CC: Linux Kernel Subject: Re: Parallel Port doesn't detect EPP In-Reply-To: <3B93DE17.92CF408E@delusion.de> <20010903220955.I20060@redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Tim Waugh wrote: > > #1) EPP is no longer listed as supported transfer mode, but it used > > to be. > > > Have you changed your BIOS setting since you last tried it? What does > your BIOS say about your parallel port? > My BIOS setting has always been "ECP+EPP". After Steffen's mail regarding "ECP+EPP" I've changed my parport BIOS setting to "EPP" and using 2.4 I now get: parport0: PC-style at 0x378, irq 7 [PCSPP,TRISTATE,EPP] I also tried 2.2. with "ECP+EPP" and it detects both ECP and EPP: [SPP,ECP,ECPEPP,ECPPS2] Apparently 2.4. doesn't detect the parport settings the same way 2.2. does. Regards, Udo.