From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Wed, 5 Sep 2001 11:56:36 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Wed, 5 Sep 2001 11:56:27 -0400 Received: from cpe-24-221-114-147.az.sprintbbd.net ([24.221.114.147]:19840 "EHLO localhost.digitalaudioresources.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Wed, 5 Sep 2001 11:56:17 -0400 Message-ID: <3B964B29.8080400@digitalaudioresources.org> Date: Wed, 05 Sep 2001 08:56:25 -0700 From: David Hollister User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:0.9.3) Gecko/20010808 X-Accept-Language: en-us MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Eric Olson CC: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Athlon doesn't like Athlon optimisation? In-Reply-To: <200109050521.WAA26155@equinox.unr.edu> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Eric Olson wrote: > Robert Redelmeier told me he has written a version of his burnMMX which > uses K7 MMX 3DNow streaming cache bypass load/store instruction sequences > similar to what is used in linux/arch/i386/lib/mmx.c > > It would be particularly interesting if someone with a problematic KT133A > based motherboard would test it and report back. Ran both burnK7 and burnMMX for 10+ minutes with no problems. FWIW, burnMMX didn't do much to my system temp, but burnK7 raised it by a good 8-9 degrees. -- David Hollister Driversoft Engineering: http://devicedrivers.com Digital Audio Resources: http://digitalaudioresources.org