From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Wed, 5 Sep 2001 15:37:15 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Wed, 5 Sep 2001 15:37:07 -0400 Received: from Hell.WH8.TU-Dresden.De ([141.30.225.3]:21257 "EHLO Hell.WH8.TU-Dresden.De") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Wed, 5 Sep 2001 15:36:46 -0400 Message-ID: <3B967EDD.5A81F2DD@delusion.de> Date: Wed, 05 Sep 2001 21:37:01 +0200 From: "Udo A. Steinberg" Organization: Disorganized X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.78 [en] (X11; U; Linux 2.4.9-ac7 i686) X-Accept-Language: en, de MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Pete Zaitcev CC: Linux Kernel Subject: Re: USB device not accepting new address In-Reply-To: <200109051619.f85GJEo07592@devserv.devel.redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Pete Zaitcev wrote: > > > I have just come across another USB address problem, which happens > > sporadically and is not easy to reproduce. > > > 1: [cfefa240] link (00000001) e0 IOC Stalled CRC/Timeo Length=7ff MaxLen=7ff > > DT1 EndPt=0 Dev=0, PID=69(IN) (buf=00000000) > > If usb_set_address() ends in timeouts, something is bad with the > hadrware, most likely. Microcode crash in the device, perhaps. > Someone, I think it was Oliver, posted a patch that retries > usb_set_address(). It may help you, look in linux-usb-devel > archives. Maybe it's a hardware problem, but this problem has never occured before Alan started merging bits of 2.4.9 into his tree. -Udo.