From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Fri, 7 Sep 2001 12:25:57 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Fri, 7 Sep 2001 12:25:46 -0400 Received: from cs173101.pp.htv.fi ([213.243.173.101]:6970 "EHLO porkkala.cs173101.pp.htv.fi") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Fri, 7 Sep 2001 12:25:39 -0400 Message-ID: <3B98F503.14A1E725@pp.htv.fi> Date: Fri, 07 Sep 2001 19:25:39 +0300 From: Jussi Laako X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.76 [en] (Win98; U) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: tegeran@home.com CC: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: K7/Athlon optimizations and Sacrifices to the Great Ones. In-Reply-To: <01090612513601.00171@c779218-a> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Nicholas Knight wrote: > > problem on the SAME physical board, just two different processors. Both > 6-4-2, the only difference is that one is 1.13Ghz and doesn't have the > problem, and the other is 1.2Ghz and DOES have the problem. This of > course leads me back to the clock speed theory, but again it doesn't make > any SENSE because the FSB on both of them is 133Mhz and I've got at least > two reports of 1.33Ghz chips running FINE! ARG! How about the synchronization issue that came up in the power saving thread? Some bus synchronization problem (integer/non-integer multiplier)? - Jussi Laako -- PGP key fingerprint: 161D 6FED 6A92 39E2 EB5B 39DD A4DE 63EB C216 1E4B Available at PGP keyservers