From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Sat, 8 Sep 2001 15:39:05 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Sat, 8 Sep 2001 15:38:55 -0400 Received: from unused ([12.150.234.220]:9469 "EHLO one.isilinux.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Sat, 8 Sep 2001 15:38:46 -0400 Message-ID: <3B9A73D5.9020607@interactivesi.com> Date: Sat, 08 Sep 2001 14:39:01 -0500 From: Timur Tabi User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:0.9.3+) Gecko/20010815 X-Accept-Language: en-us MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "Eric W. Biederman" CC: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org Subject: Re: kernel hangs in 118th call to vmalloc In-Reply-To: <3B8FDA36.5010206@interactivesi.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Eric W. Biederman wrote: > What is wrong with using SPD to detect interesting properties of > memory chips? That should be safer and usually easier then what you > are trying now. Our hardware does not interface with SPD. So I can't use SPD to query the properties. Besides, it wouldn't change anything if I did. I still need to clear out RAM.