From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Sun, 9 Sep 2001 17:19:31 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Sun, 9 Sep 2001 17:19:20 -0400 Received: from inet-mail4.oracle.com ([148.87.2.204]:7120 "EHLO inet-mail4.oraclecorp.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Sun, 9 Sep 2001 17:19:10 -0400 Message-ID: <3B9BDD7C.78B58344@oracle.com> Date: Sun, 09 Sep 2001 23:22:04 +0200 From: Alessandro Suardi Organization: Oracle Support Services X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.77 [en] (X11; U; Linux 2.4.10-pre6 i686) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Josh McKinney CC: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: compiling kernel with gcc-3 (was: 2.4.10-pre5) In-Reply-To: <3B9A95C7.DDF81890@oracle.com> <20010908230539.A4927@home.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Josh McKinney wrote: > > Since I have gotten a decent amount of flame mail from my one-liner posted > yesterday, I am just curious. Has anyone really been able to successfully > compile their kernel with gcc-3*. I did once or twice long before it was > released, but it dies on the same error everytime. I posted it to the > GCC mailing list because it was an internal compiler error, but it went > unanswered, along with other reports of the same bug. Anyway, I just want > to see if someone really is able to use it as a reliable compiler. > I've been compiling kernels since June 22 with 3.0, never a problem. -pre5 and -pre6 compiled with 3.0.1 backing out the rd.c changes. --alessandro "this is no time to get cute, it's a mad dog's promenade so walk tall, or baby don't walk at all" (Bruce Springsteen, 'New York City Serenade')