From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Sun, 9 Sep 2001 22:06:58 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Sun, 9 Sep 2001 22:06:48 -0400 Received: from mail.digitalme.com ([193.97.97.75]:13686 "EHLO digitalme.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Sun, 9 Sep 2001 22:06:35 -0400 Message-ID: <3B9C204A.7070801@digitalme.com> Date: Sun, 09 Sep 2001 22:07:06 -0400 From: "Trever L. Adams" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:0.9.3+) Gecko/20010906 X-Accept-Language: en-us MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Linux Kernel Subject: [OT] LDAP vs NIS+ security Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org I am sorry to write this off topic message. I should probably go look in google for the answer... however - Someone in arguing about implimenting directory services into the kernel said that NIS+ will always be more secure than LDAP over SSL... why is this? Trever Adams