From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Fri, 14 Sep 2001 16:48:04 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Fri, 14 Sep 2001 16:47:45 -0400 Received: from relay01.cablecom.net ([62.2.33.101]:57614 "EHLO relay01.cablecom.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Fri, 14 Sep 2001 16:47:36 -0400 Message-ID: <3BA26CFA.E3859A7A@bluewin.ch> Date: Fri, 14 Sep 2001 22:47:53 +0200 From: Otto Wyss Reply-To: otto.wyss@bluewin.ch X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.78 (Macintosh; U; PPC) X-Accept-Language: de,en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Mark Hahn CC: "'linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org'" Subject: Re: How errorproof is ext2 fs? In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > there's no reason you can't configure your boot scripts to automatically > fix such problems. and by "manually", I hope you meant that "fsck -y" > took 15 minutes to run. > ... What's this "-y" meaning, "man fsck" does not show it. Could this mean answer any question with "yes"? The 15 minutes I needed to answer about the first hundreds of questions with "y", afterwards I simply pressed "y" until the fsck was finished. O. Wyss