From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Tue, 18 Sep 2001 07:03:31 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Tue, 18 Sep 2001 07:03:22 -0400 Received: from [195.63.194.11] ([195.63.194.11]:45576 "EHLO mail.stock-world.de") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Tue, 18 Sep 2001 07:03:16 -0400 Message-ID: <3BA728CA.84D93620@evision-ventures.com> Date: Tue, 18 Sep 2001 12:58:18 +0200 From: Martin Dalecki X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.77 [en] (X11; U; Linux 2.4.3-12 i686) X-Accept-Language: en, de MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Andrew Morton CC: Linus Torvalds , Kernel Mailing List , Andrea Arcangeli Subject: Re: Linux 2.4.10-pre11 In-Reply-To: <3BA6E032.587A1DBF@zip.com.au> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Andrew Morton wrote: > OK, so this was a seriously loony workload. But suddenly, the number of people > who understand the Linux VM has gone from maybe 10 down to just one-and-a-bit. > A large number of comments have been removed, and a year's worth of > discussion has been invalidated. No I disagree if I look at the patches. The number of people went down from 10 fumbeling around without a clue to two knowing what they are doing I think ;-). IMHO this is increasing the chance that the problems will finally get sorted out.