public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "John L. Males" <jlmales@softhome.net>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Linux Kernel 2.2.20-pre10 Initial Impressions
Date: Tue, 18 Sep 2001 23:26:37 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <3BA7D82D.21744.63CF95@localhost> (raw)

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Hello,

I am not on the kernel mailing list.  I would appreciate being copied
in on any replies.

Ok, I finially had a chance to compile the 2.2.20-pre10 Kernel and
run it though some basic paces.  I need to do more specific A vs b
(against the 2.2.19 Kernel), but it seems there are some performance
issues.  It is seems especially obvious with Netscape 4.78.  I also
had a odd Xfree error, that may have had some relationship to the
performance issue.  I have to say at this point the issue seems
selective and not a general one, but I need to do a bit more
checking.  I cannot forsee this checking happening until this
weekend.

I seem to also observe some iteresting memory management differences
with the 2.2.20-pre10 kernel vs the 2.2.19 kernel with the Open Wall
patch.  Agian not enough day to day use logged in to give a sense. 
Then if I do sense, the challence to how to quanitify this will
follow.

Just thought you like to know.  Oh, I keep forgetting to ask, is
there any issue related to the superblock work that has been going on
in tha last few version of the 2.4 kernel and a 2.2.19 or other 2.2.x
kernel?  Only asking as seemd to have some very interesting problems
show up back after switching back from  2.4.8 kernel to the 2.2.19
kernel.


Regards,

John L. Males
Willowdale, Ontario
Canada
18 September 2001 23:26
mailto:jlmales@softhome.net

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: PGPfreeware 6.5.8 for non-commercial use <http://www.pgp.com>

iQA/AwUBO6geeOAqzTDdanI2EQJZywCg0yllJ8HWqhQuXdDWq6aSVu5B4EgAn0la
G1uAjzOiUjSd4goAUXRk1oLI
=4K5d
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----



"Boooomer ... Boom Boom, how are you Boom Boom" Boomer 1985 - February/2000

             reply	other threads:[~2001-09-21 22:04 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2001-09-19  4:26 John L. Males [this message]
2001-09-22 16:35 ` Linux Kernel 2.2.20-pre10 Initial Impressions Alan Cox
2001-09-22 18:11   ` Re[03]: " John L. Males
2001-09-22 19:00     ` Alan Cox
2001-09-24  1:00       ` Re[05]: " John L. Males
2001-09-25  9:41         ` Mike Fedyk
2001-09-22 18:20   ` Re[03]: " John L. Males
2001-09-24 21:02 ` Tim Moore
2001-09-25  1:25   ` Re[06]: " John L. Males
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2001-09-26  4:43 Re[07]: " John L. Males
2001-09-26 19:50 ` Tim Moore

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=3BA7D82D.21744.63CF95@localhost \
    --to=jlmales@softhome.net \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox