From: Manfred Spraul <manfred@colorfullife.com>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@transmeta.com>
Cc: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>,
Andrea Arcangeli <andrea@suse.de>,
Ulrich.Weigand@de.ibm.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Deadlock on the mm->mmap_sem
Date: Wed, 19 Sep 2001 16:08:27 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3BA8A6DB.F84C3CB3@colorfullife.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.33.0109180948260.2077-100000@penguin.transmeta.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 876 bytes --]
Linus Torvalds wrote:
>
> If the choice is between a hack to do strange and incomprehensible things
> for a special case, and just making the semaphores do the same thing
> rw-spinlocks do and make the problem go away naturally, Ill take #2 any
> day. The patches already exist, after all.
>
I've attached a recursive semaphore patch against 2.4.10-pre11 - but it
makes mmap io unusable:
Testcase:
* file, mmaped, 300 MB, 128 MB Ram
* 2 threads: touch random pages
* third thread: calls mprotect(0xFFFF00000,0x1000, PAGE_READ)
Result:
mprotect hangs forever (minutes) with recursive semaphores.
With fair semaphores, mprotect returns after ~80 milliseconds with 5
worker threads, after ~380 milliseconds with 20 worker threads (slow IDE
disk).
One alternative to David's patch would be moving the locking into the
coredump handlers - would you prefer that?
--
Manfred
[-- Attachment #2: patch-recursive --]
[-- Type: text/plain, Size: 835 bytes --]
--- 2.4/lib/rwsem-spinlock.c Sat Apr 28 10:37:27 2001
+++ build-2.4/lib/rwsem-spinlock.c Wed Sep 19 15:03:28 2001
@@ -115,7 +115,7 @@
spin_lock(&sem->wait_lock);
- if (sem->activity>=0 && list_empty(&sem->wait_list)) {
+ if (sem->activity>=0) {
/* granted */
sem->activity++;
spin_unlock(&sem->wait_lock);
--- 2.4/arch/i386/config.in Wed Sep 19 14:36:35 2001
+++ build-2.4/arch/i386/config.in Wed Sep 19 14:48:06 2001
@@ -59,8 +59,8 @@
define_bool CONFIG_X86_XADD y
define_bool CONFIG_X86_BSWAP y
define_bool CONFIG_X86_POPAD_OK y
- define_bool CONFIG_RWSEM_GENERIC_SPINLOCK n
- define_bool CONFIG_RWSEM_XCHGADD_ALGORITHM y
+ define_bool CONFIG_RWSEM_GENERIC_SPINLOCK y
+ define_bool CONFIG_RWSEM_XCHGADD_ALGORITHM n
fi
if [ "$CONFIG_M486" = "y" ]; then
define_int CONFIG_X86_L1_CACHE_SHIFT 4
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2001-09-20 2:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 50+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2001-09-17 21:50 Deadlock on the mm->mmap_sem Manfred Spraul
2001-09-17 23:39 ` Linus Torvalds
[not found] ` <200109172339.f8HNd5W13244@penguin.transmeta.com>
2001-09-18 0:01 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2001-09-18 7:31 ` Manfred Spraul
2001-09-18 7:55 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2001-09-18 8:18 ` David Howells
2001-09-18 9:32 ` David Howells
2001-09-18 9:37 ` Manfred Spraul
2001-09-18 9:49 ` Arjan van de Ven
2001-09-18 12:53 ` Manfred Spraul
2001-09-18 14:13 ` David Howells
2001-09-18 14:49 ` Alan Cox
2001-09-18 15:26 ` David Howells
2001-09-18 15:46 ` Alan Cox
2001-09-18 15:11 ` David Howells
2001-09-18 16:49 ` Linus Torvalds
2001-09-19 9:51 ` David Howells
2001-09-19 12:49 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2001-09-19 14:08 ` Manfred Spraul [this message]
2001-09-19 14:51 ` David Howells
2001-09-19 15:18 ` Manfred Spraul
2001-09-19 14:53 ` David Howells
2001-09-19 18:03 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2001-09-19 18:16 ` Benjamin LaHaise
2001-09-19 18:27 ` David Howells
2001-09-19 18:48 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2001-09-19 18:45 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2001-09-19 21:14 ` Benjamin LaHaise
2001-09-19 22:07 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2001-09-19 18:19 ` Manfred Spraul
2001-09-20 2:07 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2001-09-20 4:37 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2001-09-20 7:05 ` David Howells
2001-09-20 7:19 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2001-09-20 8:01 ` David Howells
2001-09-20 8:09 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2001-09-19 18:26 ` David Howells
2001-09-19 18:47 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2001-09-19 23:25 ` David Howells
2001-09-19 23:34 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2001-09-19 23:46 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2001-09-19 23:24 ` [PATCH] attempt #2 (Re: Deadlock on the mm->mmap_sem) David Howells
2001-09-19 14:58 ` Deadlock on the mm->mmap_sem David Howells
[not found] <masp0008@stud.uni-sb.de>
2001-09-20 10:57 ` Studierende der Universitaet des Saarlandes
2001-09-20 12:40 ` David Howells
2001-09-20 18:24 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2001-09-20 21:43 ` Manfred Spraul
2001-09-22 21:06 ` Manfred Spraul
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2001-09-18 13:22 Ulrich Weigand
2001-09-17 20:57 Ulrich Weigand
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3BA8A6DB.F84C3CB3@colorfullife.com \
--to=manfred@colorfullife.com \
--cc=Ulrich.Weigand@de.ibm.com \
--cc=andrea@suse.de \
--cc=dhowells@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=torvalds@transmeta.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox