From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Thu, 20 Sep 2001 14:59:07 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Thu, 20 Sep 2001 14:58:57 -0400 Received: from vasquez.zip.com.au ([203.12.97.41]:44303 "EHLO vasquez.zip.com.au") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Thu, 20 Sep 2001 14:58:38 -0400 Message-ID: <3BAA3C6D.AC20D953@zip.com.au> Date: Thu, 20 Sep 2001 11:58:53 -0700 From: Andrew Morton X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.77 [en] (X11; U; Linux 2.4.9-ac12 i686) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Andrea Arcangeli CC: Chris Mason , "Dieter =?iso-8859-1?Q?N=FCtzel?=" , Beau Kuiper , Andrew Morton , Robert Love , Linux Kernel List , ReiserFS List Subject: Re: [PATCH] Significant performace improvements on reiserfs systems In-Reply-To: <20010920170812.CCCACE641B@ns1.suse.com> <773660000.1001006393@tiny>, <773660000.1001006393@tiny>; from mason@suse.com on Thu, Sep 20, 2001 at 01:19:53PM -0400 <20010920204712.T729@athlon.random> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Andrea Arcangeli wrote: > > ... > --- 2.4.10pre12aa2/fs/buffer.c.~1~ Thu Sep 20 20:14:19 2001 > +++ 2.4.10pre12aa2/fs/buffer.c Thu Sep 20 20:45:58 2001 > @@ -2506,7 +2506,7 @@ > spin_unlock(&free_list[isize].lock); > > page->buffers = bh; > - page->flags &= ~(1 << PG_referenced); > + page->flags |= 1 << PG_referenced; I don't see how this can change anything - getblk() calls touch_buffer() shortly afterwards, which does the same thing?