From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Thu, 20 Sep 2001 22:12:34 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Thu, 20 Sep 2001 22:12:23 -0400 Received: from relay01.valueweb.net ([216.219.253.235]:18190 "EHLO relay01.valueweb.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Thu, 20 Sep 2001 22:12:16 -0400 Message-ID: <3BAA4ED5.EDEF3047@opersys.com> Date: Thu, 20 Sep 2001 16:17:25 -0400 From: Karim Yaghmour X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.75 [en] (X11; U; Linux 2.4.5-TRACE i686) X-Accept-Language: en, French/Canada, French/France, fr-FR, fr-CA MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Roger Larsson CC: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Robert Love Subject: Re: [PATCH] latency-profiling In-Reply-To: <200109200609.f8K69uQ26778@mailc.telia.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Roger Larsson wrote: > This patch works a little different from Robert Loves. > Since it samples the execution location at ticks. > It is possible to instrument an ordinary kernel too... You could also try the Linux Trace Toolkit which would provide you with much more accurate results and exact times instead of samples. LTT is here: http://www.opersys.com/LTT Cheers, Karim =================================================== Karim Yaghmour karym@opersys.com Embedded and Real-Time Linux Expert ===================================================