From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Tue, 25 Sep 2001 17:05:24 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Tue, 25 Sep 2001 17:05:14 -0400 Received: from vasquez.zip.com.au ([203.12.97.41]:9739 "EHLO vasquez.zip.com.au") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Tue, 25 Sep 2001 17:05:08 -0400 Message-ID: <3BB0F180.4787752C@zip.com.au> Date: Tue, 25 Sep 2001 14:05:04 -0700 From: Andrew Morton X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.77 [en] (X11; U; Linux 2.4.9-ac12 i686) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "David S. Miller" CC: riel@conectiva.com.br, marcelo@conectiva.com.br, andrea@suse.de, torvalds@transmeta.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Locking comment on shrink_caches() In-Reply-To: , <20010925.131528.78383994.davem@redhat.com> <20010925.132816.52117370.davem@redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org "David S. Miller" wrote: > > From: Rik van Riel > Date: Tue, 25 Sep 2001 17:24:21 -0300 (BRST) > > Or were you measuring loads which are mostly read-only ? > > When Kanoj Sarcar was back at SGI testing 32 processor Origin > MIPS systems, pagecache_lock was at the top. But when I asked kumon to test it on his 8-way Xeon, page_cache_lock contention proved to be insignificant. Seems to only be a NUMA thing.