From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Wed, 26 Sep 2001 11:32:31 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Wed, 26 Sep 2001 11:32:21 -0400 Received: from hermes.csd.unb.ca ([131.202.3.20]:23441 "EHLO hermes.csd.unb.ca") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Wed, 26 Sep 2001 11:32:00 -0400 X-WebMail-UserID: newton Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2001 12:41:53 -0300 From: Chris Newton To: Tim Moore Cc: linux-kernel X-EXP32-SerialNo: 00003025, 00003442 Subject: RE: FWD: RE: excessive interrupts on network cards Message-ID: <3BB21EAF@webmail1> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: WebMail (Hydra) SMTP v3.61.08 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Tim sent me this... and, yes, the count is much lower... looking around, I found 'mpstat', which returns processor statistics. From this output, I would say that procinfo has a bug in the -d and -D options, or in the man page. Thanks, for all the help guys, but this seems to be right, according to mpstat anyways. Thanks a BUNCH. Chris [root@phantom /root]# mpstat 1 Linux 2.4.10 (phantom.csd.unb.ca) 09/26/2001 12:29:48 PM CPU %user %nice %system %idle intr/s 12:29:49 PM all 3.00 0.00 9.50 87.50 5711.00 12:29:50 PM all 5.50 0.00 8.00 86.50 6139.00 12:29:51 PM all 2.00 0.00 11.00 87.00 5976.00 12:29:52 PM all 3.50 0.00 10.00 86.50 5744.00 12:29:53 PM all 5.50 0.00 9.00 85.50 5986.00 12:29:54 PM all 7.00 0.00 10.00 83.00 5904.00 12:29:55 PM all 5.00 0.00 6.50 88.50 5771.00 >===== Original Message From Tim Moore ===== >Just for grins what does 'procinfo -DSn2' say? > >Chris Newton wrote: >> ... >> uptime: 0:07:54.17 context : 43253 >> >> irq 0: 500 timer irq 16: 131 eth2 >> irq 1: 0 keyboard irq 20: 22266 eth0 >> irq 2: 0 cascade [4] irq 21: 0 eth1 >> irq 6: 0 irq 30: 0 aic7xxx >> irq 12: 0 irq 31: 121 aic7xxx >> irq 14: 0 ide0 >--