public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Thomas Hood <jdthoodREMOVETHIS@yahoo.co.uk>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: 2.4.9-ac16 good perfomer?
Date: Thu, 27 Sep 2001 23:17:21 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <3BB3EBC1.DE9AA505@yahoo.co.uk> (raw)

Either 2.4.9-ac16 has much improved VM performance over 
previous 2.4 kernels (under moderate load, at least), or someone
sneaked in to my apartment last night and upgraded my machine
while I was asleep.  I'm leaning toward the latter explanation.

--
Thomas

             reply	other threads:[~2001-09-28  3:17 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2001-09-28  3:17 Thomas Hood [this message]
2001-09-28  3:50 ` 2.4.9-ac16 good perfomer? Rik van Riel
2001-09-28 18:26   ` bill davidsen
2001-09-28 18:36     ` Rik van Riel
2001-09-28 19:14       ` Pau Aliagas
2001-09-28 22:20         ` Alan Cox
2001-09-28 19:34       ` Tools better than vmstat [was: 2.4.9-ac16 good perfomer?] Mike Fedyk
     [not found]         ` <20010928210453.B15457@flint.arm.linux.org.uk>
2001-09-28 21:53           ` Mike Fedyk
2001-09-28 22:00             ` Russell King
2001-09-28 22:33               ` Mike Fedyk
2001-09-28 23:00                 ` Russell King
2001-09-29  0:18                   ` Mike Fedyk
2001-09-29  1:08   ` 2.4.9-ac16 good perfomer? Mike Fedyk
2001-09-29  1:20     ` Rik van Riel
2001-09-29  1:25       ` [Kinda-OT] Reinventing wheels [was: 2.4.9-ac16 good perfomer?] Mike Fedyk
2001-10-01 11:14       ` 2.4.9-ac16 good perfomer? Daniel Phillips
2001-10-01 13:57         ` Load control (was: Re: 2.4.9-ac16 good perfomer?) Rik van Riel
2001-10-01 16:05           ` Daniel Phillips

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=3BB3EBC1.DE9AA505@yahoo.co.uk \
    --to=jdthoodremovethis@yahoo.co.uk \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox