public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Stefan Smietanowski <stesmi@stesmi.com>
To: Michael Bacarella <mbac@nyct.net>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [OT] New Anti-Terrorism Law makes "hacking" punishable by lifein prison
Date: Mon, 01 Oct 2001 03:26:23 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <3BB7C63F.6050109@stesmi.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.GSO.4.21.0109301744350.12896-100000@weyl.math.psu.edu> <3BB7A990.A7269167@idcomm.com> <20010930201738.A2084@sync.nyct.net>

Hi.

>>Don't forget the management that is interested in paper skills, rather
>>than ability to do the job. Unless you can add some things on paper,
>>like particular certifications, you can't even get an interview.
>>
> 
> Quick survey:
> 
> How many people here really want to work at a company where
> management tosses resumes that don't say MCSE or CCNA or RHCE?

The outcome of that is really irrelevant IMHO. People have to woro to 
make money to live. Agreeing with management of the company you work for 
(not just in this issue) is often not the defining point behind getting 
a job at said company or not.

You can get a job at company A _NOW_ so you can pay your bills etc or 
you can get a job at company B in 6 months making you not be able to pay 
your bills in that time. I'm sure most would get the job at company A 
and in the meanwhile look for company B which may or may not come. These 
are harder economical times than before.

It's the 'I don't agree with company policy on X' that makes it 'us vs 
them' quite often.

The same question can be applied on 'How many want to live in a country 
where the leaders have X, pass law Y or something?'. Same question 
really. The answer often lies in : There's no real way of changing it. 
Sure, go vote and stuff. Change it that way. It makes a difference, 
albeit some would argue the change is minimal.

Now, don't get me wrong, I'm not the anarchist type or anything, I just 
don't see the relevance of said question cause morally most would say 
"of course I don't want to work at said company!" but reality dictates 
that sometimes people have no choice.

// Stefan



  parent reply	other threads:[~2001-10-01  1:27 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 38+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2001-09-24 23:22 [OT] New Anti-Terrorism Law makes "hacking" punishable by life in prison Paul G. Allen
2001-09-24 23:35 ` Alan Cox
2001-09-25  0:34   ` Michael Rothwell
2001-09-25  0:40     ` Dan Hollis
2001-09-27 14:21       ` Pavel Machek
2001-09-26 11:48   ` Luigi Genoni
2001-09-26 12:15     ` [OT] New Anti-Terrorism Law makes "hacking" punishable by lifein prison Eugenio Mastroviti
2001-09-24 23:37 ` [OT] New Anti-Terrorism Law makes "hacking" punishable by life in prison Rik van Riel
2001-09-25  1:29   ` Jeff V. Merkey
2001-09-25  0:44     ` Crutcher Dunnavant
2001-09-25  0:52       ` David S. Miller
2001-09-25  1:32     ` Rik van Riel
2001-09-27 14:23     ` Pavel Machek
2001-09-30 21:16       ` M. Edward Borasky
2001-09-30 21:41         ` J Sloan
2001-09-30 22:40           ` M. Edward Borasky
2001-09-30 23:12             ` J Sloan
2001-10-01  1:15             ` Gerhard Mack
2001-10-01  1:29             ` Jan Harkes
2001-09-30 22:03         ` Alexander Viro
2001-09-30 23:24           ` [OT] New Anti-Terrorism Law makes "hacking" punishable by lifein prison D. Stimits
2001-10-01  0:17             ` Michael Bacarella
2001-10-01  0:33               ` M. Edward Borasky
2001-10-01  1:26               ` Stefan Smietanowski [this message]
2001-10-01  9:20           ` [OT] New Anti-Terrorism Law makes "hacking" punishable by life Henning P. Schmiedehausen
2001-09-30 22:57         ` [OT] New Anti-Terrorism Law makes "hacking" punishable by life in prison John Gluck
2001-09-30 23:32           ` D. Stimits
2001-10-01  8:47         ` Helge Hafting
2001-10-01 10:41           ` Manfred Bartz
2001-10-01 12:27             ` John Jasen
2001-10-01 12:54               ` Ookhoi
2001-10-01 11:47           ` [Moving rapidly away from LKM] (Was: Re: [OT] New Anti-Terrorism Law makes "hacking" punishable by life in) Henning P. Schmiedehausen
2001-10-01 13:12             ` Helge Hafting
2001-10-01  9:28         ` [OT] New Anti-Terrorism Law makes "hacking" punishable by life in prison Bernd Petrovitsch
2001-10-01 12:00         ` Daniel Phillips
2001-10-02  9:40         ` Vojtech Pavlik
2001-09-25 11:04   ` [OT] New Anti-Terrorism Law makes "hacking" punishable by life Henning P. Schmiedehausen
2001-09-27 14:18 ` [OT] New Anti-Terrorism Law makes "hacking" punishable by life in prison Pavel Machek

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=3BB7C63F.6050109@stesmi.com \
    --to=stesmi@stesmi.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mbac@nyct.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox