public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Helge Hafting <helgehaf@idb.hist.no>
To: hps@intermeta.de, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [Moving rapidly away from LKM] (Was: Re: [OT] New Anti-Terrorism Law  makes "hacking" punishable by life in)
Date: Mon, 01 Oct 2001 15:12:02 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <3BB86BA2.B123ACAE@idb.hist.no> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <HBEHIIBBKKNOBLMPKCBBIENPDNAA.znmeb@aracnet.com> <3BB82DA9.34499802@idb.hist.no> <9p9l5d$r8e$1@forge.intermeta.de>

"Henning P. Schmiedehausen" wrote:
> 
> Helge Hafting <helgehaf@idb.hist.no> writes:
> 
> >And the one to blame here isn't the virus writer.  The ones to blame
> >are:
> >1. Whoever decided to install that vulnerable software.
> 
> "The ones to blame are not the people that build the bombs.
Oh, they too.  They too.  My first sentence was wrong, I'm just
trying to say that increasingly harder punishment against
_dead easy_ crime won't work.  And that people actually are
responsible for taking simple precautions.  


> The ones
> to blame are the people that live in normal houses with normal locks
> or even let their doors open instead of living in fortified bunkers
> and shoot everyone on sight".

I am not that extreme.  But if someone leaves their car with the engine
running all day they are stupid and shouldn't be surprised when
it is stolen.
Someone who leave a unattended company car with the engine running 
deserve to get fired when it is stolen.  This is neglect.

Of course the thief is a criminal too, and the worst one.  But
not taking any precautions is neglecting responsibility.

[...] 
> Fact is: Most companies don't install IIS just because they're
> Microsoft slaves. They install it, because another 3rd party
> application that depends on yet another application that needs another
> piece of software to run is only available on (you may already have
> guessed it) WIN32. OLE, Visual Basic and all the heavily glued
> together windows stuff. That is what drags people to the WIN32.
> And once you're here, you use IIS. Not Apache. Not iPlanet.
> 
You can run your internet server on windows.  Nothing inherently
wrong in that.  But then you'd better put a good firewall in front 
of it.  And you'll run the latest virus checkers.  And you'll
turn _off_ particularly unsafe "features".  Windows servers can
be safe, but many aren't.

Not doing this is like storing your money in a heap on the street.
A thief taking your pile is still a thief but there is less
punishment because he didn't break in or threaten anybody.  

Helge Hafting

  reply	other threads:[~2001-10-01 13:12 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 38+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2001-09-24 23:22 [OT] New Anti-Terrorism Law makes "hacking" punishable by life in prison Paul G. Allen
2001-09-24 23:35 ` Alan Cox
2001-09-25  0:34   ` Michael Rothwell
2001-09-25  0:40     ` Dan Hollis
2001-09-27 14:21       ` Pavel Machek
2001-09-26 11:48   ` Luigi Genoni
2001-09-26 12:15     ` [OT] New Anti-Terrorism Law makes "hacking" punishable by lifein prison Eugenio Mastroviti
2001-09-24 23:37 ` [OT] New Anti-Terrorism Law makes "hacking" punishable by life in prison Rik van Riel
2001-09-25  1:29   ` Jeff V. Merkey
2001-09-25  0:44     ` Crutcher Dunnavant
2001-09-25  0:52       ` David S. Miller
2001-09-25  1:32     ` Rik van Riel
2001-09-27 14:23     ` Pavel Machek
2001-09-30 21:16       ` M. Edward Borasky
2001-09-30 21:41         ` J Sloan
2001-09-30 22:40           ` M. Edward Borasky
2001-09-30 23:12             ` J Sloan
2001-10-01  1:15             ` Gerhard Mack
2001-10-01  1:29             ` Jan Harkes
2001-09-30 22:03         ` Alexander Viro
2001-09-30 23:24           ` [OT] New Anti-Terrorism Law makes "hacking" punishable by lifein prison D. Stimits
2001-10-01  0:17             ` Michael Bacarella
2001-10-01  0:33               ` M. Edward Borasky
2001-10-01  1:26               ` Stefan Smietanowski
2001-10-01  9:20           ` [OT] New Anti-Terrorism Law makes "hacking" punishable by life Henning P. Schmiedehausen
2001-09-30 22:57         ` [OT] New Anti-Terrorism Law makes "hacking" punishable by life in prison John Gluck
2001-09-30 23:32           ` D. Stimits
2001-10-01  8:47         ` Helge Hafting
2001-10-01 10:41           ` Manfred Bartz
2001-10-01 12:27             ` John Jasen
2001-10-01 12:54               ` Ookhoi
2001-10-01 11:47           ` [Moving rapidly away from LKM] (Was: Re: [OT] New Anti-Terrorism Law makes "hacking" punishable by life in) Henning P. Schmiedehausen
2001-10-01 13:12             ` Helge Hafting [this message]
2001-10-01  9:28         ` [OT] New Anti-Terrorism Law makes "hacking" punishable by life in prison Bernd Petrovitsch
2001-10-01 12:00         ` Daniel Phillips
2001-10-02  9:40         ` Vojtech Pavlik
2001-09-25 11:04   ` [OT] New Anti-Terrorism Law makes "hacking" punishable by life Henning P. Schmiedehausen
2001-09-27 14:18 ` [OT] New Anti-Terrorism Law makes "hacking" punishable by life in prison Pavel Machek

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=3BB86BA2.B123ACAE@idb.hist.no \
    --to=helgehaf@idb.hist.no \
    --cc=hps@intermeta.de \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox