public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: J Sloan <jjs@pobox.com>
To: drevil@warpcore.org
Cc: linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: 2.4.13-pre6 breaks Nvidia's kernel module
Date: Mon, 22 Oct 2001 22:18:55 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <3BD4FDBF.7BF7FAEE@pobox.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20011022172742.B445@virtucon.warpcore.org> <E15vnuN-0003jW-00@the-village.bc.nu> <20011022203159.A20411@virtucon.warpcore.org> <20011022214324.A18888@alcove.wittsend.com> <20011022211622.B20411@virtucon.warpcore.org> <003801c15b7d$6e2e4410$01c510ac@c779218a> <20011023000826.A22123@virtucon.warpcore.org>

drevil@warpcore.org wrote:

> I'm not complaining about the NVidia driver here. I'm simply stating that IMHO,
> I find it odd that for years microsoft has not only retained binary
> compatability within a release of windows but API compatability.

That's simply note true, as many windows
users have pointed out to you.

> There should
> not be a change to the kernel that would require changes in the driver in a
> "stable development" release tree, it's really that simple in my perhaps
> somewhat limited view. Admittedly, this breakage (which is still in doubt) that
> might have happened did happen with a "pre" version, but I feel this response
> would have been no different even if that was not the case.

nvidia is the party who maintains the nvidia driver -
and they have stated that they do not support "pre"
kernel releases. Therefore, you ought to stick with
official releases.

(Funny, I never have that problem with my voodoo3!)

Also, you mentioned "customers" - most customers
would take a dim view of a sys admin who reboots
systems left and right to try various "pre" kernels!

You had best install the distro and leave it at that,
except of course that you keep up with updates.

cu

jjs




  reply	other threads:[~2001-10-23  5:18 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 48+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2001-10-22 18:45 2.4.13-pre6 breaks Nvidia's kernel module jarausch
2001-10-22 18:51 ` Benjamin LaHaise
2001-10-22 18:51 ` Alexander Viro
2001-10-22 19:35 ` Rik van Riel
2001-10-22 19:46   ` Christopher Friesen
2001-10-22 19:53     ` Daniel T. Chen
2001-10-22 19:53 ` 2.4.13-pre6 breaks Nvidia's kernel module, or not? Stephan von Krawczynski
2001-10-22 20:24 ` 2.4.13-pre6 breaks Nvidia's kernel module Alan Cox
2001-10-22 22:27   ` drevil
2001-10-22 22:43     ` Charles Cazabon
2001-10-22 22:46     ` Doug McNaught
2001-10-22 22:50     ` Alan Cox
2001-10-23  1:31       ` drevil
2001-10-23  1:43         ` Michael H. Warfield
2001-10-23  2:16           ` drevil
2001-10-23  4:44             ` Nicholas Knight
2001-10-23  5:06               ` Cort Dougan
2001-10-23 11:36                 ` Rik van Riel
2001-10-23 16:13                 ` Alan Cox
2001-10-23  5:08               ` drevil
2001-10-23  5:18                 ` J Sloan [this message]
2001-10-23  5:59                 ` Nicholas Knight
2001-10-23  7:21                 ` Helge Hafting
2001-10-23  5:35           ` Matt D. Robinson
2001-10-23 16:16             ` Alan Cox
2001-10-23  9:50           ` David Woodhouse
2001-10-23 23:45             ` Ragnar Hojland Espinosa
2001-10-23  7:57         ` Alan Cox
2001-10-23 14:18           ` drevil
2001-10-23 16:01         ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2001-10-22 23:48     ` Jeff Golds
2001-10-22 23:53 ` Horst von Brand
2001-10-23  9:05 ` Jesper Juhl
2001-10-23 18:07   ` Josh McKinney
2001-10-23 22:51     ` J . A . Magallon
2001-10-24 21:06       ` Reid Hekman
2001-10-25  0:19         ` J . A . Magallon
     [not found] <fa.fm7f5dv.1cn8eg6@ifi.uio.no>
     [not found] ` <fa.hbvlhav.v369au@ifi.uio.no>
     [not found]   ` <023001c15cf4$4fd5ecc0$1a01a8c0@allyourbase>
2001-10-25  4:15     ` Reid Hekman
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2001-10-23 12:37 Jesse Pollard
2001-10-23  9:52 PVotruba
2001-10-23  1:50 BH
2001-10-22 18:45 jarausch
2001-10-22 18:45 jarausch
2005-01-13 16:19 ` Arjan van de Ven
2005-01-13 16:50 ` Valdis.Kletnieks
2005-01-13 17:25 ` Zan Lynx
2005-01-13 17:38 ` Zwane Mwaikambo
2001-10-22 18:45 jarausch

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=3BD4FDBF.7BF7FAEE@pobox.com \
    --to=jjs@pobox.com \
    --cc=drevil@warpcore.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox