From: Edgar Toernig <froese@gmx.de>
To: Joris van Rantwijk <joris@deadlock.et.tudelft.nl>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Bind to protocol with AF_PACKET doesn't work for outgoing packets
Date: Fri, 02 Nov 2001 03:26:27 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3BE20453.22427ECB@gmx.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.21.0111010944050.16656-100000@deadlock.et.tudelft.nl>
Joris van Rantwijk wrote:
>
> I'm trying to see outgoing network packets through the AF_PACKET
> interface. This works as long as I bind the packet socket with
> sll_protocol==htons(ETH_P_ALL). I would expect that I can filter
> on IP packets by binding to sll_protocol==htons(ETH_P_IP), but when
> I try it I suddenly see only the incoming packets and no outgoing at all.
Deja vu? :-) See this message:
---------------------
> Subject: Re: PF_PACKET, ETH_P_IP does not catch outgoing packets.
> From: kuznet@ms2.inr.ac.ru
> Date: Thu, 23 Dec 1999 20:41:11 +0300 (MSK)
>
> Hello!
>
> > do not receive outgoing packets. Just changing the
> > protocol to ETH_P_ALL (or a later bind with that proto)
> > will get all packets. Is this intentional? (I don't think
> > so *g*)
>
> Yes, sort of. It is planned flaw in design. 8)
>
>
> > Any idea for a quick fix?
>
> No, it is not very easy. If it were easy, it would be made. 8)
>
> The problem is that bound to protocol sockets are not
> checked at output at all, only ETH_P_ALL ones are checked.
> We could check all, but it affects performance, because
> true protocols (looking exactly as packet socket) really
> need not it. The direction of compromise is not evident.
>
> Someone promised to think on this and repair at the end of 2.1,
> I even reserved sockopt PACKET_RECV_OUTPUT to switch it on/off,
> but, alas, I did not receive any patches.
>
> Alexey
-----------------------
Two years nobody cared. Seems the BPF is good enough...
Ciao, ET.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2001-11-02 2:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2001-11-01 9:11 Bind to protocol with AF_PACKET doesn't work for outgoing packets Joris van Rantwijk
2001-11-02 2:26 ` Edgar Toernig [this message]
[not found] <Pine.LNX.4.21.0111010944050.16656-100000@deadlock.et.tudelft.nl.suse.lists.linux.kernel>
2001-11-01 14:30 ` Andi Kleen
2001-11-01 15:18 ` Joris van Rantwijk
2001-11-01 16:46 ` Andi Kleen
2001-11-01 17:33 ` kuznet
2001-11-01 17:45 ` Andi Kleen
2001-11-01 18:09 ` kuznet
2001-11-01 18:21 ` Andi Kleen
2001-11-01 18:56 ` kuznet
2001-11-01 19:28 ` Andi Kleen
2001-11-01 19:48 ` kuznet
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3BE20453.22427ECB@gmx.de \
--to=froese@gmx.de \
--cc=joris@deadlock.et.tudelft.nl \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox