From: Ben Smith <ben@google.com>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@transmeta.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Google's mm problem - not reproduced on 2.4.13
Date: Fri, 02 Nov 2001 13:08:13 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3BE30B3D.1080505@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <E15yzlQ-00021P-00@starship.berlin> <15330.56589.291830.542215@abasin.nj.nec.com> <20011102190046.B6003@athlon.random> <20011102181758Z16039-4784+420@humbolt.nl.linux.org> <9ruvkd$jh1$1@penguin.transmeta.com>
> So how much memory is mlocked?
In the 3.5G case, we lock 4 blocks (4 * 427683520 bytes, or 1.631M).
There is code in the kernel that prevents more than 1/2 of all physical
pages from being mlocked:
mlock.c:215-218: (in do_mlock)
/* we may lock at most half of physical memory... */
/* (this check is pretty bogus, but doesn't hurt) */
if (locked > num_physpages/2)
goto out;
For 2.2 we were have a patch that increases this to 90% or 60M, but we
don't use this patch on 2.4 yet.
> Why _does_ this thing do mlock, anyway? What's the point? And how much
> does it try to lock?
Latency. We know exactly what data should remain in memory, so we're
trying to prevent the vm from paging out the wrong data. It makes a huge
difference in performance.
- Ben
Ben Smith
Google, Inc.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2001-11-02 21:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 37+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2001-10-31 18:06 Google's mm problem - not reproduced on 2.4.13 Daniel Phillips
2001-10-31 20:39 ` Daniel Phillips
2001-10-31 20:45 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2001-10-31 21:03 ` Daniel Phillips
2001-10-31 21:53 ` Andreas Dilger
2001-11-01 4:52 ` Daniel Phillips
2001-11-01 16:56 ` undefined reference in 2.2.19 build with Reiserfs (was: Google's mm problem - not reproduced on 2.4.13) Sven Heinicke
2001-11-01 22:39 ` Keith Owens
2001-10-31 22:12 ` Google's mm problem - not reproduced on 2.4.13 Ben Smith
2001-11-01 0:34 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2001-11-02 17:51 ` Sven Heinicke
2001-11-02 18:00 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2001-11-02 18:19 ` Daniel Phillips
2001-11-02 20:27 ` Linus Torvalds
2001-11-02 21:08 ` Ben Smith [this message]
2001-11-02 21:20 ` Linus Torvalds
2001-11-02 22:42 ` Ben Smith
2001-11-02 23:15 ` Daniel Phillips
2001-11-03 22:53 ` Adaptec vs Symbios performance Stephan von Krawczynski
2001-11-03 23:01 ` arjan
2001-11-02 21:12 ` Google's mm problem - not reproduced on 2.4.13 Rik van Riel
[not found] ` <200111022027.fA2KRwe20006@penguin.transmeta.com>
2001-11-02 20:58 ` Daniel Phillips
2001-11-02 18:11 ` Daniel Phillips
2001-11-02 18:48 ` Sven Heinicke
2001-11-02 18:57 ` Daniel Phillips
2001-11-01 0:19 ` Daniel Phillips
2001-11-01 0:29 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2001-11-01 1:17 ` Ben Smith
2001-11-01 1:41 ` Rik van Riel
2001-11-01 1:55 ` Ben Smith
2001-11-01 2:06 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2001-10-31 20:48 ` Rik van Riel
2001-10-31 21:04 ` Daniel Phillips
2001-10-31 21:08 ` Rik van Riel
[not found] <Pine.LNX.4.33.0111021250560.20078-100000@penguin.transmeta.com>
2001-11-02 21:13 ` Linus Torvalds
2001-11-02 21:27 ` Stephan von Krawczynski
2001-11-03 0:16 ` Linus Torvalds
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3BE30B3D.1080505@google.com \
--to=ben@google.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=torvalds@transmeta.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox