From: "Daniel R. Warner" <drwarner@mail.myrealbox.com>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Yet another design for /proc. Or actually /kernel.
Date: Wed, 07 Nov 2001 14:42:48 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3BE98EB8.6000802@mail.myrealbox.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <slrn9uj1nf.5lj.spamtrap@dexter.hensema.xs4all.nl>
Erik Hensema wrote:
> Here's my go at a new design for /proc. I designed it from a userland
> point of view and tried not to drown myself into details.
<snip>
> - Multiple values per file when needed
> A file is a two dimensional array: it has lines and every line
> can consist of multiple fields.
> A good example of this is the current /proc/mounts.
> This can be parsed very easily in all languages.
> No need for single-value files, that's oversimplification.
<snip>
This is fine for reading, but it makes it harder for humans to change
values in /proc - eg, echo 0 > /proc/sys/net/ipv4/tcp_ecn
-D
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2001-11-07 21:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2001-11-07 19:09 Yet another design for /proc. Or actually /kernel Erik Hensema
2001-11-07 19:27 ` Alan Cox
2001-11-08 0:54 ` /proc discussions Tim Jansen
2001-11-08 2:23 ` Alexander Viro
2001-11-07 19:42 ` Daniel R. Warner [this message]
2001-11-07 22:35 ` Yet another design for /proc. Or actually /kernel Allen Campbell
2001-11-07 20:58 ` H. Peter Anvin
2001-11-07 21:19 ` Justin A
2001-11-07 23:44 ` Rusty Russell
2001-11-08 0:35 ` Stephen Satchell
[not found] <w_knop@hotmail.com>
2001-11-07 19:41 ` William Knop
2001-11-08 0:27 ` John Levon
2001-11-08 8:56 ` Erik Hensema
2001-11-08 10:00 ` Remco Post
2001-11-09 16:44 ` Ricky Beam
2001-11-12 13:31 ` Horst von Brand
2001-11-12 14:31 ` Martin Dalecki
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2001-11-07 21:13 Brenneke, Matthew Jeffrey (UMR-Student)
2001-11-08 0:00 ` H. Peter Anvin
2001-11-08 0:20 ` antirez
2001-11-08 0:32 ` H. Peter Anvin
2001-11-08 0:54 ` David Ford
2001-11-08 1:10 ` antirez
2001-11-08 1:26 ` H. Peter Anvin
2001-11-08 1:51 ` antirez
2001-11-08 0:44 ` Stephen Satchell
2001-11-08 1:04 ` antirez
2001-11-08 0:55 ` Jonathan Lundell
2001-11-08 3:07 ` Stuart Young
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3BE98EB8.6000802@mail.myrealbox.com \
--to=drwarner@mail.myrealbox.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox