From: David Chandler <chandler@grammatech.com>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Bug Report: Dereferencing a bad pointer
Date: Wed, 07 Nov 2001 18:23:13 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3BE9C261.D7422143@grammatech.com> (raw)
Bug Report
Summary:
Dereferencing a bad pointer in user space hangs rather than causing a
segmentation fault in 2.4.x kernels.
Keywords:
memory protection address dereference segmentation fault SIGSEGV
Full Description:
The following one-line C program, when compiled by gcc 2.96 without
optimization, should produce a SIGSEGV segmentation fault (on a machine
with 3 or less gigabytes of virtual memory, at least):
int main() { int k = *(int *)0xc0000000; }
However, it does not do so under 2.4.x -- it does cause a seg fault
under
2.2.x kernels.
Specifically, no seg fault occurs under kernels 2.4.2-2 (Red Hat build),
2.4.13, 2.4.13UML, 2.4.9UML, or 2.4.8UML. This one-liner does cause a
seg fault on 2.2.5-15 (Red Hat build) and 2.2.14-5.0 (Red Hat build).
All these were run on Pentium II, Pentium III, and Pentium 4 chips.
The "UML" kernels are Linus's official releases patched with the
user-mode linux patches and run on a Red Hat 7.1 2.4.2-2 Pentium 4 host;
Tom's rtbt was the UML file system.
Note that UML uses arch/um rather than arch/i386; this seems to remove
some suspicion from 'arch/i386/mm/fault.c', which has changed
considerably from 2.2.x to 2.4.x.
Rather than seg faulting, the 2.4.x kernels just sit at the offensive
dereference until you interrupt the process. Interruption works
flawlessly; you can use 'kill -INT', 'kill -SEGV' or 'kill -BUS' to
interrupt the process.
Please Cc: me on any responses -- the linux-kernel traffic is too much
for me.
David Chandler
--
_____
David L. Chandler. GrammaTech, Inc.
mailto:chandler@grammatech.com http://www.grammatech.com
next reply other threads:[~2001-11-07 23:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2001-11-07 23:23 David Chandler [this message]
2001-11-07 23:40 ` Bug Report: Dereferencing a bad pointer Benjamin LaHaise
2001-11-08 15:29 ` David Chandler
2001-11-08 16:02 ` Richard B. Johnson
2001-11-08 17:17 ` David Chandler
2001-11-08 21:32 ` Richard B. Johnson
2001-11-08 21:57 ` David Chandler
2001-11-08 22:39 ` Brian Gerst
2001-11-08 23:15 ` David Chandler
2001-11-09 13:33 ` Richard B. Johnson
2001-11-08 17:53 ` Tahar
2001-11-08 16:27 ` Benjamin LaHaise
2001-11-08 18:02 ` Alan Cox
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3BE9C261.D7422143@grammatech.com \
--to=chandler@grammatech.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox