public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Steve Bergman <steve@uhura.rueb.com>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: steve@rueb.com
Subject: Best kernel config for exactly 1GB ram
Date: Sun, 11 Nov 2001 14:56:58 -0600	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <3BEEE61A.6050002@uhura.rueb.com> (raw)

Hi,


I have just upgraded my athlon 1200 system to 1GB ram.  I am unclear as 
to how I should configure the kernel for this box.  The config.help says 
   to say no to "high memory support" if the kernel will not run on a 
machne with more than 1GB.  When I do this I notice that my available 
memory as reported by top is ~ 120MB less than if I say I want 4GB 
support.  I recall that linux reserves some of the address space for 
itself (I thought it was just 64MB).

What are the trade offs involved here?  Am I better off sacrificing a 
bit of the physical memory for reasons of efficiency elsewhere?  When I 
request support for up to 4GB, what exactly changes with respect to the 
visible virtual address space that apps see, etc?

This is a desktop machine, so it's not running Oracle or anything like 
that.  I seem to recall Linus mentioning that big databases tend to like 
the large (3GB) virtual address space.

Any enlightenment would be greatly appreciated.



Thanks,
Steve Bergman
steve@rueb.com


             reply	other threads:[~2001-11-11 20:52 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2001-11-11 20:56 Steve Bergman [this message]
2001-11-11 22:13 ` Best kernel config for exactly 1GB ram Xavier Bestel
2001-11-11 22:33 ` Mark Zealey
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2001-11-12  6:38 Zwane Mwaikambo
2001-11-12  6:59 ` David Lang

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=3BEEE61A.6050002@uhura.rueb.com \
    --to=steve@uhura.rueb.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=steve@rueb.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox