Oops in reiserfs w/2.4.7-10

Oops in reiserfs w/2.4.7-10

[brett]

Hey,

Found this in dmesg today...
Default RH7.2 kernel

I have no idea how/what triggered it, so I doubt trying with a later
kernel to see if it happens again will help (it came after almost 10 days
of uptime).  Just posting this on the off chance it may be an undiscovered
bug.

ksymoops 2.4.1 on i686 2.4.7-10.  Options used
     -V (default)
     -k /proc/ksyms (default)
     -l /proc/modules (default)
     -o /lib/modules/2.4.7-10/ (default)
     -m /boot/System.map-2.4.7-10 (default)

Warning: You did not tell me where to find symbol information.  I will
assume that the log matches the kernel and modules that are running
right now and I'll use the default options above for symbol resolution.
If the current kernel and/or modules do not match the log, you can get
more accurate output by telling me the kernel version and where to find
map, modules, ksyms etc.  ksymoops -h explains the options.

Error (expand_objects): cannot stat(/lib/ext3.o) for ext3
Error (expand_objects): cannot stat(/lib/jbd.o) for jbd
Warning (compare_maps): mismatch on symbol partition_name  , ksyms_base
says c01b30d0, System.map says c0154d30.  Ignoring ksyms_base entryWarning
(compare_maps): mismatch on symbol tone_control  , emu10k1 says d7aede94,
/lib/modules/2.4.7-10/kernel/drivers/sound/emu10k1/emu10k1.o says
d7aed0c0.  Ignoring
/lib/modules/2.4.7-10/kernel/drivers/sound/emu10k1/emu10k1.o entry
Warning (compare_maps): mismatch on symbol nlmsvc_grace_period  , lockd
says d2980bd4, /lib/modules/2.4.7-10/kernel/fs/lockd/lockd.o says
d298003c.  Ignoring /lib/modules/2.4.7-10/kernel/fs/lockd/lockd.o entry
Warning (compare_maps): mismatch on symbol nlmsvc_ops  , lockd says
d2980bd0, /lib/modules/2.4.7-10/kernel/fs/lockd/lockd.o says d2980038.
Ignoring /lib/modules/2.4.7-10/kernel/fs/lockd/lockd.o entry
Warning (compare_maps): mismatch on symbol nlmsvc_timeout  , lockd says
d2980bd8, /lib/modules/2.4.7-10/kernel/fs/lockd/lockd.o says d2980040.
Ignoring /lib/modules/2.4.7-10/kernel/fs/lockd/lockd.o entry
Warning (compare_maps): mismatch on symbol nfs_debug  , sunrpc says
d2972d40, /lib/modules/2.4.7-10/kernel/net/sunrpc/sunrpc.o says d2972a00.
Ignoring /lib/modules/2.4.7-10/kernel/net/sunrpc/sunrpc.o entry
Warning (compare_maps): mismatch on symbol nfsd_debug  , sunrpc says
d2972d44, /lib/modules/2.4.7-10/kernel/net/sunrpc/sunrpc.o says d2972a04.
Ignoring /lib/modules/2.4.7-10/kernel/net/sunrpc/sunrpc.o entry
Warning (compare_maps): mismatch on symbol nlm_debug  , sunrpc says
d2972d48, /lib/modules/2.4.7-10/kernel/net/sunrpc/sunrpc.o says d2972a08.
Ignoring /lib/modules/2.4.7-10/kernel/net/sunrpc/sunrpc.o entry
Warning (compare_maps): mismatch on symbol rpc_debug  , sunrpc says
d2972d3c, /lib/modules/2.4.7-10/kernel/net/sunrpc/sunrpc.o says d29729fc.
Ignoring /lib/modules/2.4.7-10/kernel/net/sunrpc/sunrpc.o entry
Warning (compare_maps): mismatch on symbol rpc_garbage_args  , sunrpc says
d2972d1c, /lib/modules/2.4.7-10/kernel/net/sunrpc/sunrpc.o says d29729dc.
Ignoring /lib/modules/2.4.7-10/kernel/net/sunrpc/sunrpc.o entry
Warning (compare_maps): mismatch on symbol rpc_success  , sunrpc says
d2972d0c, /lib/modules/2.4.7-10/kernel/net/sunrpc/sunrpc.o says d29729cc.
Ignoring /lib/modules/2.4.7-10/kernel/net/sunrpc/sunrpc.o entry
Warning (compare_maps): mismatch on symbol rpc_system_err  , sunrpc says
d2972d20, /lib/modules/2.4.7-10/kernel/net/sunrpc/sunrpc.o says d29729e0.
Ignoring /lib/modules/2.4.7-10/kernel/net/sunrpc/sunrpc.o entry
Warning (compare_maps): mismatch on symbol xdr_one  , sunrpc says
d2972d04, /lib/modules/2.4.7-10/kernel/net/sunrpc/sunrpc.o says d29729c4.
Ignoring /lib/modules/2.4.7-10/kernel/net/sunrpc/sunrpc.o entry
Warning (compare_maps): mismatch on symbol xdr_two  , sunrpc says
d2972d08, /lib/modules/2.4.7-10/kernel/net/sunrpc/sunrpc.o says d29729c8.
Ignoring /lib/modules/2.4.7-10/kernel/net/sunrpc/sunrpc.o entry
Warning (compare_maps): mismatch on symbol xdr_zero  , sunrpc says
d2972d00, /lib/modules/2.4.7-10/kernel/net/sunrpc/sunrpc.o says d29729c0.
Ignoring /lib/modules/2.4.7-10/kernel/net/sunrpc/sunrpc.o entry
Warning (compare_maps): mismatch on symbol usb_devfs_handle  , usbcore
says d285ba00, /lib/modules/2.4.7-10/kernel/drivers/usb/usbcore.o says
d285b520.  Ignoring /lib/modules/2.4.7-10/kernel/drivers/usb/usbcore.o
entry
Warning (map_ksym_to_module): cannot match loaded module ext3 to a unique
module object.  Trace may not be reliable.
Unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at virtual address
00000000
c0113f15
*pde = 00000000
Oops: 0002
CPU:    0
EIP:    0010:[<c0113f15>]
Using defaults from ksymoops -t elf32-i386 -a i386
EFLAGS: 00013246
eax: 00000000   ebx: cac3bf8c   ecx: cac3a000   edx: 00000000
esi: 049cafc6   edi: 00000005   ebp: cac3bfb4   esp: cac3bf88
ds: 0018   es: 0018   ss: 0018
Process kreiserfsd (pid: 301, stackpage=cac3b000)
Stack: cac3bf8c 00000000 00000000 049cafc6 cac3a000 c0113d40 c02aec20
00000018
       00000018 d2899108 00000286 cac3bfd8 c0114581 00000000 cac3a000
d2899108
       d2899108 00000700 ce8f3e20 cea40400 00004000 d288ee33 00000018
00000018
Call Trace: [<c0113d40>] [<d2899108>] [<c0114581>] [<d2899108>]
[<d2899108>]
   [<d288ee33>] [<c010570d>] [<c0105716>] [<d288ed80>]
Code: 00 00 00 c7 45 e8 00 80 25 c0 8b 55 dc c7 45 e0 18 fc ff ff

>>EIP; c0113f15 <schedule+c5/3d0>   <=====
Trace; c0113d40 <process_timeout+0/50>
Trace; d2899108 <[reiserfs]reiserfs_commit_thread_wait+4/c>
Trace; c0114581 <interruptible_sleep_on_timeout+41/60>
Trace; d2899108 <[reiserfs]reiserfs_commit_thread_wait+4/c>
Trace; d2899108 <[reiserfs]reiserfs_commit_thread_wait+4/c>
Trace; d288ee33 <[reiserfs]reiserfs_journal_commit_thread+b3/e0>
Trace; c010570d <kernel_thread+1d/30>
Trace; c0105716 <kernel_thread+26/30>
Trace; d288ed80 <[reiserfs]reiserfs_journal_commit_thread+0/e0>
Code;  c0113f15 <schedule+c5/3d0>
00000000 <_EIP>:
Code;  c0113f15 <schedule+c5/3d0>   <=====
   0:   00 00                     add    %al,(%eax)   <=====
Code;  c0113f17 <schedule+c7/3d0>
   2:   00 c7                     add    %al,%bh
Code;  c0113f19 <schedule+c9/3d0>
   4:   45                        inc    %ebp
Code;  c0113f1a <schedule+ca/3d0>
   5:   e8 00 80 25 c0            call   c025800a <_EIP+0xc025800a>
8036bf1f Before first symbol
Code;  c0113f1f <schedule+cf/3d0>
   a:   8b 55 dc                  mov    0xffffffdc(%ebp),%edx
Code;  c0113f22 <schedule+d2/3d0>
   d:   c7 45 e0 18 fc ff ff      movl   $0xfffffc18,0xffffffe0(%ebp)


18 warnings and 2 errors issued.  Results may not be reliable.

thanks,

	/ Brett

Re: Oops in reiserfs w/2.4.7-10

[Hans Reiser]

brett@bad-sports.com wrote:

>Hey,
>
>Found this in dmesg today...
>Default RH7.2 kernel
>
>I have no idea how/what triggered it, so I doubt trying with a later
>kernel to see if it happens again will help (it came after almost 10 days
>of uptime).  Just posting this on the off chance it may be an undiscovered
>bug.
>
>ksymoops 2.4.1 on i686 2.4.7-10.  Options used
>     -V (default)
>     -k /proc/ksyms (default)
>     -l /proc/modules (default)
>     -o /lib/modules/2.4.7-10/ (default)
>     -m /boot/System.map-2.4.7-10 (default)
>
>Warning: You did not tell me where to find symbol information.  I will
>assume that the log matches the kernel and modules that are running
>right now and I'll use the default options above for symbol resolution.
>If the current kernel and/or modules do not match the log, you can get
>more accurate output by telling me the kernel version and where to find
>map, modules, ksyms etc.  ksymoops -h explains the options.
>
>Error (expand_objects): cannot stat(/lib/ext3.o) for ext3
>Error (expand_objects): cannot stat(/lib/jbd.o) for jbd
>Warning (compare_maps): mismatch on symbol partition_name  , ksyms_base
>says c01b30d0, System.map says c0154d30.  Ignoring ksyms_base entryWarning
>(compare_maps): mismatch on symbol tone_control  , emu10k1 says d7aede94,
>/lib/modules/2.4.7-10/kernel/drivers/sound/emu10k1/emu10k1.o says
>d7aed0c0.  Ignoring
>/lib/modules/2.4.7-10/kernel/drivers/sound/emu10k1/emu10k1.o entry
>Warning (compare_maps): mismatch on symbol nlmsvc_grace_period  , lockd
>says d2980bd4, /lib/modules/2.4.7-10/kernel/fs/lockd/lockd.o says
>d298003c.  Ignoring /lib/modules/2.4.7-10/kernel/fs/lockd/lockd.o entry
>Warning (compare_maps): mismatch on symbol nlmsvc_ops  , lockd says
>d2980bd0, /lib/modules/2.4.7-10/kernel/fs/lockd/lockd.o says d2980038.
>Ignoring /lib/modules/2.4.7-10/kernel/fs/lockd/lockd.o entry
>Warning (compare_maps): mismatch on symbol nlmsvc_timeout  , lockd says
>d2980bd8, /lib/modules/2.4.7-10/kernel/fs/lockd/lockd.o says d2980040.
>Ignoring /lib/modules/2.4.7-10/kernel/fs/lockd/lockd.o entry
>Warning (compare_maps): mismatch on symbol nfs_debug  , sunrpc says
>d2972d40, /lib/modules/2.4.7-10/kernel/net/sunrpc/sunrpc.o says d2972a00.
>Ignoring /lib/modules/2.4.7-10/kernel/net/sunrpc/sunrpc.o entry
>Warning (compare_maps): mismatch on symbol nfsd_debug  , sunrpc says
>d2972d44, /lib/modules/2.4.7-10/kernel/net/sunrpc/sunrpc.o says d2972a04.
>Ignoring /lib/modules/2.4.7-10/kernel/net/sunrpc/sunrpc.o entry
>Warning (compare_maps): mismatch on symbol nlm_debug  , sunrpc says
>d2972d48, /lib/modules/2.4.7-10/kernel/net/sunrpc/sunrpc.o says d2972a08.
>Ignoring /lib/modules/2.4.7-10/kernel/net/sunrpc/sunrpc.o entry
>Warning (compare_maps): mismatch on symbol rpc_debug  , sunrpc says
>d2972d3c, /lib/modules/2.4.7-10/kernel/net/sunrpc/sunrpc.o says d29729fc.
>Ignoring /lib/modules/2.4.7-10/kernel/net/sunrpc/sunrpc.o entry
>Warning (compare_maps): mismatch on symbol rpc_garbage_args  , sunrpc says
>d2972d1c, /lib/modules/2.4.7-10/kernel/net/sunrpc/sunrpc.o says d29729dc.
>Ignoring /lib/modules/2.4.7-10/kernel/net/sunrpc/sunrpc.o entry
>Warning (compare_maps): mismatch on symbol rpc_success  , sunrpc says
>d2972d0c, /lib/modules/2.4.7-10/kernel/net/sunrpc/sunrpc.o says d29729cc.
>Ignoring /lib/modules/2.4.7-10/kernel/net/sunrpc/sunrpc.o entry
>Warning (compare_maps): mismatch on symbol rpc_system_err  , sunrpc says
>d2972d20, /lib/modules/2.4.7-10/kernel/net/sunrpc/sunrpc.o says d29729e0.
>Ignoring /lib/modules/2.4.7-10/kernel/net/sunrpc/sunrpc.o entry
>Warning (compare_maps): mismatch on symbol xdr_one  , sunrpc says
>d2972d04, /lib/modules/2.4.7-10/kernel/net/sunrpc/sunrpc.o says d29729c4.
>Ignoring /lib/modules/2.4.7-10/kernel/net/sunrpc/sunrpc.o entry
>Warning (compare_maps): mismatch on symbol xdr_two  , sunrpc says
>d2972d08, /lib/modules/2.4.7-10/kernel/net/sunrpc/sunrpc.o says d29729c8.
>Ignoring /lib/modules/2.4.7-10/kernel/net/sunrpc/sunrpc.o entry
>Warning (compare_maps): mismatch on symbol xdr_zero  , sunrpc says
>d2972d00, /lib/modules/2.4.7-10/kernel/net/sunrpc/sunrpc.o says d29729c0.
>Ignoring /lib/modules/2.4.7-10/kernel/net/sunrpc/sunrpc.o entry
>Warning (compare_maps): mismatch on symbol usb_devfs_handle  , usbcore
>says d285ba00, /lib/modules/2.4.7-10/kernel/drivers/usb/usbcore.o says
>d285b520.  Ignoring /lib/modules/2.4.7-10/kernel/drivers/usb/usbcore.o
>entry
>Warning (map_ksym_to_module): cannot match loaded module ext3 to a unique
>module object.  Trace may not be reliable.
>Unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at virtual address
>00000000
>c0113f15
>*pde = 00000000
>Oops: 0002
>CPU:    0
>EIP:    0010:[<c0113f15>]
>Using defaults from ksymoops -t elf32-i386 -a i386
>EFLAGS: 00013246
>eax: 00000000   ebx: cac3bf8c   ecx: cac3a000   edx: 00000000
>esi: 049cafc6   edi: 00000005   ebp: cac3bfb4   esp: cac3bf88
>ds: 0018   es: 0018   ss: 0018
>Process kreiserfsd (pid: 301, stackpage=cac3b000)
>Stack: cac3bf8c 00000000 00000000 049cafc6 cac3a000 c0113d40 c02aec20
>00000018
>       00000018 d2899108 00000286 cac3bfd8 c0114581 00000000 cac3a000
>d2899108
>       d2899108 00000700 ce8f3e20 cea40400 00004000 d288ee33 00000018
>00000018
>Call Trace: [<c0113d40>] [<d2899108>] [<c0114581>] [<d2899108>]
>[<d2899108>]
>   [<d288ee33>] [<c010570d>] [<c0105716>] [<d288ed80>]
>Code: 00 00 00 c7 45 e8 00 80 25 c0 8b 55 dc c7 45 e0 18 fc ff ff
>
>>>EIP; c0113f15 <schedule+c5/3d0>   <=====
>>>
>Trace; c0113d40 <process_timeout+0/50>
>Trace; d2899108 <[reiserfs]reiserfs_commit_thread_wait+4/c>
>Trace; c0114581 <interruptible_sleep_on_timeout+41/60>
>Trace; d2899108 <[reiserfs]reiserfs_commit_thread_wait+4/c>
>Trace; d2899108 <[reiserfs]reiserfs_commit_thread_wait+4/c>
>Trace; d288ee33 <[reiserfs]reiserfs_journal_commit_thread+b3/e0>
>Trace; c010570d <kernel_thread+1d/30>
>Trace; c0105716 <kernel_thread+26/30>
>Trace; d288ed80 <[reiserfs]reiserfs_journal_commit_thread+0/e0>
>Code;  c0113f15 <schedule+c5/3d0>
>00000000 <_EIP>:
>Code;  c0113f15 <schedule+c5/3d0>   <=====
>   0:   00 00                     add    %al,(%eax)   <=====
>Code;  c0113f17 <schedule+c7/3d0>
>   2:   00 c7                     add    %al,%bh
>Code;  c0113f19 <schedule+c9/3d0>
>   4:   45                        inc    %ebp
>Code;  c0113f1a <schedule+ca/3d0>
>   5:   e8 00 80 25 c0            call   c025800a <_EIP+0xc025800a>
>8036bf1f Before first symbol
>Code;  c0113f1f <schedule+cf/3d0>
>   a:   8b 55 dc                  mov    0xffffffdc(%ebp),%edx
>Code;  c0113f22 <schedule+d2/3d0>
>   d:   c7 45 e0 18 fc ff ff      movl   $0xfffffc18,0xffffffe0(%ebp)
>
>
>18 warnings and 2 errors issued.  Results may not be reliable.
>
>thanks,
>
>	/ Brett
>
>-
>To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
>the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
>More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/
>
>
Please upgrade to a recent linus kernel.  I don't know what went into 
RedHat 7.2, but secondhand reports are that reiserfs is not stable in 
that kernel.

Hans

Re: Oops in reiserfs w/2.4.7-10

[Arjan van de Ven]

> Please upgrade to a recent linus kernel.  I don't know what went into
> RedHat 7.2, but secondhand reports are that reiserfs is not stable in
> that kernel.

Please stop badmouthing people that don't happen to pay you. (and don't
mis-spell their name).

The Red Hat Linux 7.2 kernels don't have reiserfs patches so all bugs
are
yours and yours alone.....

Re: Oops in reiserfs w/2.4.7-10

[Alan Cox]

> Please upgrade to a recent linus kernel.  I don't know what went into 
> RedHat 7.2, but secondhand reports are that reiserfs is not stable in 
> that kernel.

I wouldnt upgrade to a Linus kernel. That lacks several drivers, ext3, 32bit
uid capable quota and some other stuff. 2.4.15pre3 has some of that now.

You should however grab the Red Hat errata (2.4.9 series) kernel either
via up2date or from a Red Hat ftp archive. That fixes several things.

Alan

Re: Oops in reiserfs w/2.4.7-10

[Hans Reiser]

Arjan van de Ven wrote:

>>Please upgrade to a recent linus kernel.  I don't know what went into
>>RedHat 7.2, but secondhand reports are that reiserfs is not stable in
>>that kernel.
>>
>
>Please stop badmouthing people that don't happen to pay you. (and don't
>mis-spell their name).
>
>The Red Hat Linux 7.2 kernels don't have reiserfs patches so all bugs
>are
>yours and yours alone.....
>
>
If I understand correctly that it is 2.4.7 that went in, and there were 
no memory manager or vfs patches, then you are almost surely correct, 
and it probably has some relatively rare bugs fixed recently but is 
reasonably stable on the whole.  He should still upgrade to a recent 
Linus kernel though.  Yura, have you tested this kernel yet?  Do you 
recognize this bug as a fixed bug?

Hans

Re: Oops in reiserfs w/2.4.7-10

[Hans Reiser]

We have now tested the latest Red Hat 7.2 kernel (2.4.7.-10) and it 
passes our regression tests, which means that it is indeed a reasonably 
stable kernel that I would be willing to put my home directory on if it 
was me and I wasn't using NFS on it.  (I used 2.4.5 on my laptop for 
months with no problem, and I would guess that it is as stable as that 
one, when we talk about stable, remember we mean stable for a a few 
hundred thousand users).  The latest Linus kernels will be more stable, 
and since Linux is still stabilizing, I would guess that using a recent 
kernel is going to remain a good idea for the next few months.  
 Apologies to Red Hat for relying on second hand reports, and for that 
reason advising users to go to a kernel I had more knowledge about. 
 Users using NFS should keep a watch on the recently found bug involving 
rename, I think a patch just came out recently, and I expect it will be 
going into the kernel soon.

Hans

Re: Oops in reiserfs w/2.4.7-10

[Hans Reiser]

Correction, the NFS rename bug I mentioned is not reiserfs specific, and 
it is fixed by Neil Brown in a patch that is reported to work by our 
users, and it is better described as  a hardlink to unexported files bug 
rather than a rename bug.  So if you apply that patch, or export entire 
filesystems only, it is reasonable to use reiserfs for home directories.

Hans