public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Peter Wächtler" <pwaechtler@loewe-komp.de>
To: "Christian, Chip" <chip_christian@hp.com>
Cc: linux-xfs@oss.sgi.com, lkml <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: NFS hit me (2.4.9-xfs) again
Date: Tue, 13 Nov 2001 10:01:06 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <3BF0E152.47AC899@loewe-komp.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <23D04BDBA646D411BDDD00D0B774B539046028B7@SA-BWMAIL1>

"Christian, Chip" wrote:
> 
> The reason that dput was dropped in 2.4.10 is that there's another one that also gets executed, causing the kernel oops right after the
> 
>         if (!pdentry) {
>         }
> code block.
> 
> I think you have a filesystem in need of repair.
> 
> RedHat ships this patch with their 2.4.9 kernels:
> 
> --- linux/fs/nfsd/nfsfh.c~      Fri Aug 17 21:30:25 2001
> +++ linux/fs/nfsd/nfsfh.c       Fri Aug 17 21:30:40 2001
> @@ -275,7 +275,6 @@
>         d_drop(tdentry); /* we never want ".." hashed */
>         if (!pdentry && tdentry->d_inode == NULL) {
>                 /* File system cannot find ".." ... sad but possible */
> -               dput(tdentry);
>                 pdentry = ERR_PTR(-EINVAL);
>         }
>         if (!pdentry) {

Yes, the patch makes sense.
I've checked both: /home and /usr/local with xfs_check and with xfs_repair -n
No warning, no error.

I have removed /var/tmp, which is a reiserfs, from /etc/exports
but it was seldom used (if any).

Thanks for your effort. I will now closely follow any nfs related patches.

> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Peter Wächtler [mailto:pwaechtler@loewe-komp.de]
> Sent: Friday, November 09, 2001 5:01
> To: linux-xfs@oss.sgi.com
> Cc: lkml
> Subject: NFS hit me (2.4.9-xfs) again
> 
> Unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at virtual address 00000000
> 00000000
> *pde = 00000000
> Oops: 0000
> CPU:    0
> EIP:    0010:[<00000000>]
> Using defaults from ksymoops -t elf32-i386 -a i386
> EFLAGS: 00010286
> eax: 00000000   ebx: c9c0d7e0   ecx: 00000000   edx: c03a7b00
> esi: c9c0d560   edi: c9c0d7e0   ebp: c9c0d7e0   esp: cbddde84
> ds: 0018   es: 0018   ss: 0018
> Process nfsd (pid: 233, stackpage=cbddd000)
> Stack: c01729f4 cc97f420 c9c0d560 00000005 cdc40a00 c0172e56 c9c0d7e0 00000005
>        cd390200 cd390000 cbed2000 cbdddf20 cdc40be8 cd390200 c0173199 cdc40a00
>        cd390010 00000005 00000001 00000001 00000008 cbe17e00 cbee48c0 cd390200
> Call Trace: [<c01729f4>] [<c0172e56>] [<c0173199>] [<c0173ad2>] [<c017843d>]
>    [<c017173c>] [<c0171003>] [<c0240318>] [<c0170dab>] [<c010557f>]
> Code:  Bad EIP value.
> 
> >>EIP; 00000000 Before first symbol
> Trace; c01729f4 <nfsd_findparent+34/104>
> Trace; c0172e56 <find_fh_dentry+226/34c>
> Trace; c0173199 <fh_verify+21d/438>
> Trace; c0173ad2 <nfsd_lookup+92/4b8>
> Trace; c017843d <nfssvc_decode_diropargs+5d/d0>
> Trace; c017173c <nfsd_proc_lookup+88/9c>
> Trace; c0171003 <nfsd_dispatch+cb/168>
> Trace; c0240318 <svc_process+2ac/544>
> Trace; c0170dab <nfsd+1ab/338>
> Trace; c010557f <kernel_thread+23/30>
> 
> This is not the initial crash location - the machine was dead (and no serial
> console yet). But after restarting, about 6-10 clients tried to reconnect
> to NFSD and caused the crash.
> 
> The crash appears because "child->d_inode->i_op->lookup == NULL"
>

  reply	other threads:[~2001-11-13  9:02 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2001-11-09 19:31 NFS hit me (2.4.9-xfs) again Christian, Chip
2001-11-13  9:01 ` Peter Wächtler [this message]
     [not found] <1005258455.4701.4.camel@itspec.amoa.org>
     [not found] ` <1005258497.9075.22.camel@jen.americas.sgi.com>
     [not found]   ` <1005259546.5742.9.camel@itspec.amoa.org>
     [not found]     ` <1005261542.9077.29.camel@jen.americas.sgi.com>
2001-11-09 10:00       ` Peter Wächtler

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=3BF0E152.47AC899@loewe-komp.de \
    --to=pwaechtler@loewe-komp.de \
    --cc=chip_christian@hp.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-xfs@oss.sgi.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox