From: Anders Peter Fugmann <afu@fugmann.dhs.org>
To: John Jasen <jjasen1@umbc.edu>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: SiS630 chipsets && linux 2.4.x kernel == snails pace?
Date: Sun, 18 Nov 2001 22:41:50 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3BF82B1E.8090305@fugmann.dhs.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.SGI.4.31L.02.0111181459340.12354143-100000@irix2.gl.umbc.edu>
On 11/18/2001 09:11 PM, John Jasen wrote:
> On Sun, 18 Nov 2001, Anders Peter Fugmann wrote:
>>
>>Another thing... Is it the same machine?
>>
>
> I have three machines with SiS630 boards at the moment.
>
> Two are identical, except for current kernel. (labrat5 and labrat6)
Hmm. It seems that these machines are in fact not identical.
I would strongly suggest that you try to boot either one with another
kernel, and see how it reacts.
(if labrat6 is still fast using a 2.4 kernel, or if labrat5 is still
slow with a 2.2 kernel, you have successfully shown a hardware/BIOS
differnce between the two machines.)
Another idea could be not to compile in SIS support.
It might be that the driver is broken. The 2.2 kernel does not have
support for the chipset, and uses general drivers instead. That should
explain why throughput is higher in 2.4 kernel.
Thats the best I can do for now. Sorry.
> configs and lspci output added to
> http://www.realityfailure.org/~jjasen/SiS630
I really cannot understand why they differ, since Revision numbers are
identical, but alot of IO-ports are not. Maybe you have two different
revisions of the same motherboard.
Anyone else care to try and explain?
Regards
Anders Fugmann
next parent reply other threads:[~2001-11-18 21:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <Pine.SGI.4.31L.02.0111181459340.12354143-100000@irix2.gl.umbc.edu>
2001-11-18 21:41 ` Anders Peter Fugmann [this message]
2001-11-18 21:55 ` SiS630 chipsets && linux 2.4.x kernel == snails pace? John Jasen
2001-11-19 0:44 ` Stuart Young
2001-11-19 1:19 ` John Jasen
2001-11-19 3:04 Nate Eldredge
2001-11-19 3:05 ` Nate Eldredge
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2001-11-18 15:02 John Jasen
2001-11-18 18:01 ` Anders Peter Fugmann
2001-11-18 18:37 ` John Jasen
2001-11-18 18:52 ` John Jasen
2001-11-19 1:07 ` John Jasen
2001-11-19 2:12 ` Anders Peter Fugmann
2001-11-19 2:53 ` John Jasen
2001-11-19 4:55 ` John Jasen
2001-11-19 17:48 ` John Jasen
2001-11-21 16:51 ` John Jasen
2001-11-22 1:36 ` D. Hugh Redelmeier
2001-11-17 22:22 John Jasen
2001-11-18 2:01 ` John Jasen
2001-11-18 4:09 ` Anders Peter Fugmann
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3BF82B1E.8090305@fugmann.dhs.org \
--to=afu@fugmann.dhs.org \
--cc=jjasen1@umbc.edu \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox