From: Anders Peter Fugmann <afu@fugmann.dhs.org>
To: John Jasen <jjasen1@umbc.edu>
Cc: John Jasen <jjasen@realityfailure.org>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: SiS630 chipsets && linux 2.4.x kernel == snails pace?
Date: Mon, 19 Nov 2001 03:12:22 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3BF86A86.1010804@fugmann.dhs.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.SGI.4.31L.02.0111182006470.12243284-100000@irix2.gl.umbc.edu>
On 11/19/2001 02:07 AM, John Jasen wrote:
> On Sun, 18 Nov 2001, John Jasen wrote:
>
>
>>// RH 2.2.19-6.2.1
>>439.35user 54.86system 8:19.45elapsed 98%CPU (0avgtext+0avgdata 0maxresident)k
>>0inputs+0outputs (357039major+484758minor)pagefaults 0swaps
>>
>>// 2.4.12
>>
>
> 5230.73user 52.88system 1:28:09elapsed 99%CPU (0avgtext+0avgdata 0maxresident)k
> 0inputs+0outputs (346527major+482788minor)pagefaults 0swaps
Funny how the system time is almost identical, while 10 times as much
time is spend in userspace.
What does top say while compiling a kernel? (On a 2.4.12 system)
I just had this strange thought that the problem might not be with the
disc, but a whole other place - like some process hogging the CPU, and
not allowing gcc to do its job.
How does 'grep -r "somestring"' on 2.4.12 compre to 2.2.19?
Regards
Anders Fugmann
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2001-11-19 2:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2001-11-18 15:02 SiS630 chipsets && linux 2.4.x kernel == snails pace? John Jasen
2001-11-18 18:01 ` Anders Peter Fugmann
2001-11-18 18:37 ` John Jasen
2001-11-18 18:52 ` John Jasen
2001-11-19 1:07 ` John Jasen
2001-11-19 2:12 ` Anders Peter Fugmann [this message]
2001-11-19 2:53 ` John Jasen
2001-11-19 4:55 ` John Jasen
2001-11-19 17:48 ` John Jasen
2001-11-21 16:51 ` John Jasen
2001-11-22 1:36 ` D. Hugh Redelmeier
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2001-11-19 3:04 Nate Eldredge
2001-11-19 3:05 ` Nate Eldredge
[not found] <Pine.SGI.4.31L.02.0111181459340.12354143-100000@irix2.gl.umbc.edu>
2001-11-18 21:41 ` Anders Peter Fugmann
2001-11-18 21:55 ` John Jasen
2001-11-19 0:44 ` Stuart Young
2001-11-19 1:19 ` John Jasen
2001-11-17 22:22 John Jasen
2001-11-18 2:01 ` John Jasen
2001-11-18 4:09 ` Anders Peter Fugmann
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3BF86A86.1010804@fugmann.dhs.org \
--to=afu@fugmann.dhs.org \
--cc=jjasen1@umbc.edu \
--cc=jjasen@realityfailure.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox