From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id <S280612AbRKSSx1>; Mon, 19 Nov 2001 13:53:27 -0500
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org
	id <S280608AbRKSSxR>; Mon, 19 Nov 2001 13:53:17 -0500
Received: from c0mailgw.prontomail.com ([216.163.180.10]:17687 "EHLO
	c0mailgw12.prontomail.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
	id <S280597AbRKSSxD>; Mon, 19 Nov 2001 13:53:03 -0500
Message-ID: <3BF954E2.48F9C7EE@starband.net>
Date: Mon, 19 Nov 2001 13:52:18 -0500
From: war <war@starband.net>
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.79 [en] (X11; U; Linux 2.4.14 i686)
X-Accept-Language: en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Swap Swap Swap
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

What benchmarking utilities could I use to test the system
responsiveness with SWAP vs no SWAP?

Because with no swap it does feel faster; however many people object to
this statement.