From: Heinz-Ado Arnolds <Ado.Arnolds@dhm-systems.de>
To: torvalds@transmeta.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk
Subject: fs/exec.c and binfmt-xxx in 2.4.14
Date: Wed, 21 Nov 2001 17:58:26 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3BFBDD32.434AB47B@web-systems.net> (raw)
Hi Linus, Hi Alan, Hi all,
I have a problem with loading modules for binary formats. The
reason for this problem shows up in fs/exec.c search_binary_handler().
Starting with linux-2.1.23 (and up to 2.4.14) there was a change
in the format and offset of printing the magic number for requesting
a handler module. Up to 2.1.22 the statement
sprintf(modname, "binfmt-%hd", *(unsigned short *)(&bprm->buf[0]));
^^ ^^^
was used. Now, and up to 2.4.14, the statement is:
sprintf(modname, "binfmt-%04x", *(unsigned short *)(&bprm->buf[2]));
^^^ ^^^
This leads to a request for loading a module which doesn't exist.
Additionally the request is now done with a hex number but modprobe
expects decimal numbers.
>From modutils-2.4.12/util/alias.h:
...
"binfmt-267 binfmt_aout",
...
"binfmt-332 iBCS",
...
When i now try to start an older binary in a.out format, which has a
magic number of 0x010b0064, it is translated with the 'new' code to a
request for "binfmt-0064" instead of "binfmt-267" as expected and
properly handled by modprobe.
Another example: for an old COFF executable with magic number
0x014c0004 the generated request is "binfmt-0004" instead of the
correct value "binfmt-332".
Wouldn't it be appropriate to revert the changes to format "%hd"
and use buffer offset 0 again?
Thanks a lot for your help and many greetings from Cologne, Germany
Ado
--
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Heinz-Ado Arnolds Ado.Arnolds@web-systems.net
Websystems GmbH +49 2234 1840-0 (voice)
Max-Planck-Strasse 2, 50858 Koeln, Germany +49 2234 1840-40 (fax)
next reply other threads:[~2001-11-21 16:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2001-11-21 16:58 Heinz-Ado Arnolds [this message]
2001-11-21 17:08 ` fs/exec.c and binfmt-xxx in 2.4.14 Martin Dalecki
2001-11-21 17:31 ` Heinz-Ado Arnolds
2001-11-22 13:21 ` Colin Watson
2001-11-21 20:14 ` Andreas Ferber
2001-11-22 11:47 ` Heinz-Ado Arnolds
2001-11-22 12:43 ` Richard Guenther
2001-11-22 13:31 ` Andreas Schwab
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3BFBDD32.434AB47B@web-systems.net \
--to=ado.arnolds@dhm-systems.de \
--cc=alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=torvalds@transmeta.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox