* gcc vs intel's cc
@ 2001-11-23 14:36 Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk
2001-11-23 14:47 ` Martin Eriksson
` (2 more replies)
0 siblings, 3 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk @ 2001-11-23 14:36 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-kernel
hi all
have anyone tried Intel's commercial compiler and tried to compare the
results with gcc?
roy
--
Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk, MCSE, MCNE, CLS, LCA
Computers are like air conditioners.
They stop working when you open Windows.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread* Re: gcc vs intel's cc
2001-11-23 14:36 gcc vs intel's cc Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk
@ 2001-11-23 14:47 ` Martin Eriksson
2001-11-23 14:48 ` François Cami
2001-11-23 19:45 ` J Sloan
2 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Martin Eriksson @ 2001-11-23 14:47 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk, linux-kernel
----- Original Message -----
From: "Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk" <roy@karlsbakk.net>
To: <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Sent: Friday, November 23, 2001 3:36 PM
Subject: gcc vs intel's cc
> hi all
>
> have anyone tried Intel's commercial compiler and tried to compare the
> results with gcc?
I have heard it's pretty nice, even for Athlon XP's, but you can't compile
the kernel with it anyway, so this should not be in "linux-kernel".
_____________________________________________________
| Martin Eriksson <nitrax@giron.wox.org>
| MSc CSE student, department of Computing Science
| Umeå University, Sweden
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: gcc vs intel's cc
2001-11-23 14:36 gcc vs intel's cc Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk
2001-11-23 14:47 ` Martin Eriksson
@ 2001-11-23 14:48 ` François Cami
2001-11-23 19:45 ` J Sloan
2 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: François Cami @ 2001-11-23 14:48 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk; +Cc: linux-kernel
Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk wrote:
> hi all
>
> have anyone tried Intel's commercial compiler and tried to compare the
> results with gcc?
>
> roy
It's faster, but i read that it cannot compile the kernel yet.
François
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: gcc vs intel's cc
2001-11-23 14:36 gcc vs intel's cc Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk
2001-11-23 14:47 ` Martin Eriksson
2001-11-23 14:48 ` François Cami
@ 2001-11-23 19:45 ` J Sloan
2 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: J Sloan @ 2001-11-23 19:45 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk; +Cc: linux-kernel
Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk wrote:
> hi all
>
> have anyone tried Intel's commercial compiler and tried to compare the
> results with gcc?
yes and no.
The intel compiler has shown better performance
for userspace programs - however it is incapable
of compiling the kernel.
cu
jjs
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2001-11-23 19:46 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2001-11-23 14:36 gcc vs intel's cc Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk
2001-11-23 14:47 ` Martin Eriksson
2001-11-23 14:48 ` François Cami
2001-11-23 19:45 ` J Sloan
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox