Re: Kernel Releases

[Martin Knoblauch <Martin.Knoblauch@TeraPort.de>]

> Re: Kernel Releases
> 
> 
> > Development kernels are development kernels... nothing else. Look to
> > distributors for high degrees of quality assurance testing. When you run a
> > development kernel you have joined the development team, even if you don't
> > know it. Finding and reporting bugs is your job...
> 
> That's why you stay away from 2.5.x, or 2.4.x-pre, or 2.4.x-ac -- which
> are development kernels. 2.4.x kernels are released kernels.
> 

 The point being made (I believe) is that recently the "released"
kernels have had a low quality with showstopper-quality bugs being
introduced, but not detected,  very late in the -preX cycle. What the
initiator of this thread wants is a longer testing of the last -preX
version. And changes between that an the "release" confined to bug/doc
fixing *only*. Whether this has to be under the "-rcX" label, or not -
the idea behind it is sound.

Martin
-- 
------------------------------------------------------------------
Martin Knoblauch         |    email:  Martin.Knoblauch@TeraPort.de
TeraPort GmbH            |    Phone:  +49-89-510857-309
C+ITS                    |    Fax:    +49-89-510857-111
http://www.teraport.de   |    Mobile: +49-170-4904759