From: Didier Moens <Didier.Moens@dmb001.rug.ac.be>
To: Nicolas Aspert <Nicolas.Aspert@epfl.ch>
Cc: Abraham vd Merwe <abraham@2d3d.co.za>,
Linux Kernel Development <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
skraw@ithnet.com
Subject: Re: [Fwd: Re: OOPS in agpgart (2.4.13, 2.4.15pre7)]
Date: Tue, 27 Nov 2001 11:48:35 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3C036F83.2000903@dmb.rug.ac.be> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <linux.kernel.3C021570.4000603@dmb.rug.ac.be> <3C022BB4.7080707@epfl.ch> <1006808870.817.0.camel@phantasy> <3C02BF41.1010303@xs4all.be> <20011127101148.C5778@crystal.2d3d.co.za> <3C034CAE.2090103@dmb.rug.ac.be> <20011127111022.B881@crystal.2d3d.co.za> <3C036245.6080105@dmb.rug.ac.be> <3C036553.3040505@epfl.ch>
Nicolas Aspert wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> To sum up : this is an IBM A30p, with an "external" Radeon Mobility LY
>> (32 MB), and an 830MP instead of an 830M. The 830MP is common for both
>> IBM A30 and A30p models.
>>
>>
>
> OK ! so you _do_ have an external graphic card (that's what looked
> unclear to me),
> for which AGP should work in the same way it does for other Intel
> chipsets...
>
> So why not trying the little patch I attach below, which should make
> your stuff work, without breaking too much the i830 support for on-board
> adapters... The patch is for 2.4.16, but is likely to be applied easily
> on another recent kernel. Keep me informed...
1. modprobe agpgart loads OK :
Nov 27 11:34:47 localhost kernel: Linux agpgart interface v0.99 (c) Jeff
Hartmann
Nov 27 11:34:47 localhost kernel: agpgart: Maximum main memory to use
for agp memory: 439M
Nov 27 11:34:47 localhost kernel: agpgart: Detected an Intel 830M, but
could not find the secondary device.
Nov 27 11:34:47 localhost kernel: agpgart: Trying the Intel 830MP stuff
Nov 27 11:34:47 localhost kernel: agpgart: Detected Intel i830M chipset
Nov 27 11:34:47 localhost kernel: agpgart: AGP aperture is 256M @ 0xd0000000
[root@localhost agp]# /home/didier/repository/kernel/testgart
version: 0.99
bridge id: 0x35758086
agp_mode: 0x1f000217
aper_base: 0xd0000000
aper_size: 256
pg_total: 112384
pg_system: 112384
pg_used: 0
entry.key : 0
entry.key : 1
Allocated 8 megs of GART memory
MemoryBenchmark: 858 mb/s
MemoryBenchmark: 876 mb/s
MemoryBenchmark: 890 mb/s
Average speed: 874 mb/s
Testing data integrity (1st pass): passed on first pass.
Testing data integrity (2nd pass): passed on second pass.
2. compared to Stephan's original patches ("if i830m_dev ..." and
"break;") :
Nov 27 11:37:07 localhost kernel: Linux agpgart interface v0.99 (c) Jeff
Hartmann
Nov 27 11:37:07 localhost kernel: agpgart: Maximum main memory to use
for agp memory: 439M
Nov 27 11:37:07 localhost kernel: agpgart: Detected Intel i830M chipset
Nov 27 11:37:07 localhost kernel: agpgart: AGP aperture is 256M @ 0xd0000000
[root@localhost agp]# /home/didier/repository/kernel/testgart
version: 0.99
bridge id: 0x35758086
agp_mode: 0x1f000217
aper_base: 0xd0000000
aper_size: 256
pg_total: 112384
pg_system: 112384
pg_used: 0
entry.key : 0
entry.key : 1
Allocated 8 megs of GART memory
MemoryBenchmark: 859 mb/s
MemoryBenchmark: 887 mb/s
MemoryBenchmark: 876 mb/s
Average speed: 874 mb/s
Testing data integrity (1st pass): passed on first pass.
Testing data integrity (2nd pass): passed on second pass.
Is the 8 megs of GART OK ?
Is the memory benchmark comparable to equally equipped machines (1.2G
P-III(M), i830(MP), ATI Radeon(M)) ? (I'm trying to differentiate my
performance problem between agpgart and X DRI/DRM).
Kind regards,
Didier
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2001-11-27 10:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <linux.kernel.3C021570.4000603@dmb.rug.ac.be>
2001-11-26 11:47 ` [Fwd: Re: OOPS in agpgart (2.4.13, 2.4.15pre7)] Nicolas Aspert
2001-11-26 21:07 ` Robert Love
2001-11-26 22:16 ` Didier Moens
2001-11-27 7:57 ` Nicolas Aspert
[not found] ` <20011127101148.C5778@crystal.2d3d.co.za>
[not found] ` <3C034CAE.2090103@dmb.rug.ac.be>
2001-11-27 9:10 ` Abraham vd Merwe
2001-11-27 9:52 ` Didier Moens
2001-11-27 10:05 ` Nicolas Aspert
2001-11-27 10:48 ` Didier Moens [this message]
2001-11-27 11:12 ` Stephan von Krawczynski
2001-11-27 11:43 ` Nicolas Aspert
2001-11-27 12:10 ` Stephan von Krawczynski
2001-11-27 12:49 ` Didier Moens
2001-11-27 10:51 ` Stephan von Krawczynski
2001-11-26 12:43 ` [PATCH]Re: " Nicolas Aspert
2001-11-26 10:12 Didier Moens
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3C036F83.2000903@dmb.rug.ac.be \
--to=didier.moens@dmb001.rug.ac.be \
--cc=Nicolas.Aspert@epfl.ch \
--cc=abraham@2d3d.co.za \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=skraw@ithnet.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox