Re: About 2.4.16

Mike Fedyk
2001-11-29T20:52:23Z

On Thu, Nov 29, 2001 at 04:04:49PM +0100, pil@mailnet.de wrote:
> Martin Eriksson wrote:
> >
>
> >
> > Oh.. 2.4.13 was pretty usable too, so maybe 3 times slower?
> >
>
> Not for me. I reported an hfs-bug for 2.4.12 up to 2.4.14. So 6 times
> slower would be the best for the users and - I guess - developers too.
>

more/faster -pre and less/slower releases.